BGUK.L vs. NWG.L
BGUK.L (Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc) and NWG.L (NatWest Group plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BGUK.L in Collective Investments, NWG.L in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, BGUK.L returned 5.78%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for NWG.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGUK.L vs. NWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGUK.L achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly higher than NWG.L's -5.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BGUK.L has underperformed NWG.L with an annualized return of 5.78%, while NWG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.64% annualized return.
BGUK.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- -0.44%
- 10Y*
- 5.78%
NWG.L
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- -5.14%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- 39.80%
- 5Y*
- 28.41%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
BGUK.L vs. NWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGUK.L Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc | 2.94% | 17.54% | 11.15% | 2.25% | -29.88% | 8.18% | 12.73% | 28.68% | -5.18% | 9.73% |
NWG.L NatWest Group plc | -5.14% | 71.03% | 95.51% | -11.95% | 13.55% | 38.31% | -30.23% | 23.42% | -21.46% | 23.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGUK.L and NWG.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006 | 0.42 |
The correlation between BGUK.L and NWG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (10 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BGUK.L:
£23.80M
NWG.L:
£29.79B
BGUK.L:
£24.70M
NWG.L:
£17.05B
BGUK.L:
-£21.08M
NWG.L:
£8.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGUK.L vs. NWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
BGUK.L
NWG.L
BGUK.L vs. NWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc (BGUK.L) and NatWest Group plc (NWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGUK.L | NWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 0.93 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 2.37 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGUK.L | NWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.69 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.96 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.41 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | -0.18 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
BGUK.L vs. NWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGUK.L drawdown since its inception was -62.23%, smaller than the maximum NWG.L drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGUK.L and NWG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGUK.L | NWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.23% | -98.29% | +36.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -22.06% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -32.06% | +12.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.21% | -39.51% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.69% | -65.39% | +21.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.49% | -86.30% | +77.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.32% | -87.36% | +72.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 8.66% | -4.82% |
Volatility
BGUK.L vs. NWG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc (BGUK.L) is 5.26%, while NatWest Group plc (NWG.L) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that BGUK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGUK.L | NWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 6.96% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 23.04% | -10.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.76% | 29.70% | -14.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 29.61% | -9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 33.58% | -12.63% |
Dividends
BGUK.L vs. NWG.L - Dividend Comparison
BGUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than NWG.L's 5.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGUK.L Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc | 2.71% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.17% | 2.36% | 1.00% | 1.37% | 2.18% | 3.69% | 3.05% | 3.12% | 3.21% |
NWG.L NatWest Group plc | 5.47% | 3.84% | 4.35% | 7.06% | 11.29% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 9.66% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BGUK.L vs. NWG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc and NatWest Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BGUK.L and NWG.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BGUK.L and NWG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer