PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGUK.L vs. BP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BGUK.L vs. BP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc (BGUK.L) and BP plc (BP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGUK.L achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than BP.L's 29.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BGUK.L has underperformed BP.L with an annualized return of 5.78%, while BP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.02% annualized return.


BGUK.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
2.94%
6M
2.44%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
5.78%

BP.L

1D
0.24%
1M
0.18%
YTD
29.32%
6M
23.60%
1Y
60.91%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
17.10%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGUK.L vs. BP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGUK.L
Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc
2.94%17.54%11.15%2.25%-29.88%8.18%12.73%28.68%-5.18%9.73%
BP.L
BP plc
29.32%16.65%-11.03%2.65%50.71%36.34%-41.69%1.09%0.45%9.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BGUK.L and BP.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006

0.38

The correlation between BGUK.L and BP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

BGUK.L:

£23.80M

BP.L:

£193.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BGUK.L:

£24.70M

BP.L:

£42.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

BGUK.L:

-£21.08M

BP.L:

£35.50B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGUK.L vs. BP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGUK.L
BGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BP.L
BP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGUK.L vs. BP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc (BGUK.L) and BP plc (BP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGUK.LBP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.36

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

4.28

-3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

12.03

-9.45

BGUK.L vs. BP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the BP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGUK.L and BP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGUK.LBP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

2.13

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.60

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.33

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.16

+0.08

Drawdowns

BGUK.L vs. BP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGUK.L drawdown since its inception was -62.23%, roughly equal to the maximum BP.L drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGUK.L and BP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGUK.LBP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.23%

-63.14%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-14.15%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-35.64%

+16.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.21%

-35.64%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.69%

-63.14%

+19.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.49%

-8.91%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.32%

-18.30%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

5.05%

-1.21%

Volatility

BGUK.L vs. BP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc (BGUK.L) is 5.26%, while BP plc (BP.L) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that BGUK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGUK.LBP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

8.23%

-2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

24.30%

-12.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

28.45%

-13.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.68%

28.61%

-8.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

30.64%

-9.69%

Dividends

BGUK.L vs. BP.L - Dividend Comparison

BGUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than BP.L's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGUK.L
Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc
2.71%2.79%3.14%2.17%2.36%1.00%1.37%2.18%3.69%3.05%3.12%3.21%
BP.L
BP plc
4.56%5.68%6.04%4.79%4.32%4.70%9.60%6.78%6.16%5.93%5.77%7.45%

Financials

BGUK.L vs. BP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc and BP plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
-3.01M
51.14B
(BGUK.L) Total Revenue
(BP.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BGUK.L and BP.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGUK.L and BP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer