BGUK.L vs. ATS.L
BGUK.L (Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc) and ATS.L (Artemis Alpha Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the Collective Investments industry within the Financial Services sector. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGUK.L vs. ATS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BGUK.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.44%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
ATS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGUK.L vs. ATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGUK.L Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc | 2.94% | 17.54% | 11.15% | 2.25% | -29.88% | 8.18% | 12.73% | 28.68% | -5.18% | 9.73% |
ATS.L Artemis Alpha Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.19% | 8.48% | -23.43% | 1.79% | 14.53% | 32.59% | -12.99% | 20.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGUK.L and ATS.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2000 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
BGUK.L:
£23.80M
ATS.L:
£22.97M
BGUK.L:
£24.70M
ATS.L:
£21.42M
BGUK.L:
-£21.08M
ATS.L:
£25.14M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGUK.L vs. ATS.L — Risk / Return Rank
BGUK.L
ATS.L
BGUK.L vs. ATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc (BGUK.L) and Artemis Alpha Trust (ATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGUK.L | ATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGUK.L | ATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BGUK.L vs. ATS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGUK.L | ATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.49% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.03% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | — | — |
Volatility
BGUK.L vs. ATS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGUK.L | ATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.77% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.68% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | — | — |
Dividends
BGUK.L vs. ATS.L - Dividend Comparison
BGUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while ATS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATS.L Artemis Alpha Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.17% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.55% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.01% | 1.09% |
BGUK.L Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc | 2.71% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.17% | 2.36% | 1.00% | 1.37% | 2.18% | 3.69% | 3.05% | 3.12% | 3.85% |
Financials
BGUK.L vs. ATS.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc and Artemis Alpha Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BGUK.L and ATS.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BGUK.L and ATS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer