PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BGT vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BGT vs. WFSPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) and WFSPX (iShares S&P 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - BGT is a Bank Loan fund managed by BlackRock, while WFSPX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, BGT returned 6.13%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for WFSPX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGT charges 1.74%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for WFSPX.

Performance

BGT vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BGT has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 6.13%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.

BGT

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
1.38%
1Y
-1.80%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
6.13%

WFSPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.80%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.72%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGT vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust		-0.49%-0.84%16.12%26.29%-16.57%25.89%-0.81%18.97%-11.95%3.91%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund		11.69%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BGT and WFSPX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2004

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust

iShares S&P 500 Index Fund

Often compared with BGT:
BGT vs. VGTBGT vs. EFTBGT vs. ECATBGT vs. MPVBGT vs. BITBGT vs. CWBBGT vs. BIZD
Often compared with WFSPX:
WFSPX vs. JLGMXWFSPX vs. VOOWFSPX vs. FSPGXWFSPX vs. FXAIXWFSPX vs. BRMKXWFSPX vs. IVVWFSPX vs. APGYX

Return for Risk

BGT vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BGT
BGT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGT vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BGTWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.17
2.52

-2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.18
3.42

-3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.46

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

3.35

-3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.36

15.65

-16.01

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGT vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGT Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGT and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

BGTWFSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

2.52

-2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.85

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.87

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.13

+0.16

Drawdowns

BGT vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, roughly equal to the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and WFSPX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BGTWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.06%

-58.21%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-8.90%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.91%

-18.74%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.19%

-24.51%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.90%

-33.74%

-8.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.56%

0.00%

-6.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-12.77%

+4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

1.90%

+3.09%

Volatility

BGT vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) is 1.63%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that BGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BGTWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

2.82%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

8.97%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

11.85%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

16.88%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.34%

18.02%

-2.68%

BGT vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGT vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.51%, more than WFSPX's 1.56% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust		13.51%12.74%11.22%10.36%6.87%5.55%7.58%6.33%6.64%5.03%5.03%6.04%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund		1.56%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

BGT and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFSPX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to BGT (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGT dropped -58.06% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGT and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer