BGT vs. LFRIX
BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) and LFRIX (Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, BGT returned 6.41%/yr vs 4.47%/yr for LFRIX. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BGT charges 1.74%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LFRIX.
Performance
BGT vs. LFRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than LFRIX's 2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BGT has outperformed LFRIX with an annualized return of 6.41%, while LFRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.47% annualized return.
BGT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- -3.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.38%
LFRIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 5.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 4.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.54M | $1.32M | $1.16M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BGT vs. LFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 2.82% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 3.91% |
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund | 2.32% | 6.30% | 8.28% | 12.22% | -2.99% | 5.48% | -1.47% | 7.59% | -0.01% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGT and LFRIX is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2007 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGT vs. LFRIX — Risk / Return Rank
BGT
LFRIX
BGT vs. LFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGT | LFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.78 | -0.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.40 | -3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 12.60 | -13.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGT vs. LFRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than LFRIX's maximum drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and LFRIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGT | LFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -27.90% | -30.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -1.55% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.91% | -2.59% | -13.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | -6.23% | -16.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.90% | -21.75% | -20.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -0.37% | -3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -1.93% | -6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 0.42% | +4.99% |
Volatility
BGT vs. LFRIX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) at 0.34%. This indicates that BGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGT | LFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 0.34% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 1.90% | +5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 2.44% | +7.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 2.87% | +10.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 3.91% | +11.44% |
BGT vs. LFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than LFRIX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGT vs. LFRIX - Dividend Comparison
BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.38%, more than LFRIX's 6.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.38% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund | 6.24% | 7.20% | 7.68% | 7.63% | 3.95% | 4.01% | 4.64% | 5.71% | 5.60% | 4.65% | 4.64% | 4.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGT and LFRIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGT has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to LFRIX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGT dropped -58.06% vs LFRIX's -27.90%.
LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGT and LFRIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer