BGS vs. UA
BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) and UA (Under Armour, Inc.) are both stocks. BGS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while UA operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, BGS returned -14.86%/yr vs -16.19%/yr for UA. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGS vs. UA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -2.65% return, which is significantly lower than UA's 22.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has outperformed UA with an annualized return of -14.86%, while UA has yielded a comparatively lower -16.19% annualized return.
BGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- -25.46%
- 5Y*
- -27.79%
- 10Y*
- -14.86%
UA
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 17.84%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 6M
- 41.35%
- 1Y
- -4.85%
- 3Y*
- -5.28%
- 5Y*
- -20.46%
- 10Y*
- -16.19%
BGS vs. UA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -2.65% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -31.93% | -12.20% | -15.46% |
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 22.50% | -35.66% | -10.66% | -6.39% | -50.55% | 21.24% | -22.42% | 18.61% | 21.40% | -47.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and UA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016 | 0.20 |
The correlation between BGS and UA shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BGS:
$323.22M
UA:
$2.50B
BGS:
-$0.96
UA:
-$1.16
BGS:
0.18
UA:
0.51
BGS:
0.80
UA:
1.77
BGS:
$1.81B
UA:
$4.97B
BGS:
$388.44M
UA:
$2.26B
BGS:
$91.70M
UA:
-$86.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGS vs. UA — Risk / Return Rank
BGS
UA
BGS vs. UA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Under Armour, Inc. (UA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGS | UA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.02 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.20 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | -0.33 | +0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGS vs. UA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -86.50%, smaller than the maximum UA drawdown of -91.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and UA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGS | UA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.50% | -91.34% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.11% | -42.86% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.36% | -60.16% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -82.50% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.50% | -89.92% | +3.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.99% | -87.14% | +3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -69.19% | +37.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.32% | 26.26% | -14.94% |
Volatility
BGS vs. UA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) is 9.65%, while Under Armour, Inc. (UA) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that BGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGS | UA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 11.83% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.85% | 43.31% | -9.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.42% | 53.90% | -2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.32% | 50.27% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.31% | 50.37% | -4.06% |
Dividends
BGS vs. UA - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.86%, while UA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 18.86% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BGS vs. UA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and Under Armour, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BGS vs. UA - Profitability Comparison
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
UA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 465.14M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
UA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
UA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BGS and UA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UA has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to BGS (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGS dropped -86.50% vs UA's -91.34%.
BGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGS and UA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer