BGS vs. MKC
BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) and MKC (McCormick & Company, Incorporated) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, BGS returned -14.86%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for MKC. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGS vs. MKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -2.65% return, which is significantly higher than MKC's -27.49% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed MKC with an annualized return of -14.86%, while MKC has yielded a comparatively higher 1.82% annualized return.
BGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- -25.46%
- 5Y*
- -27.79%
- 10Y*
- -14.86%
MKC
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- -27.49%
- 6M
- -25.55%
- 1Y
- -31.93%
- 3Y*
- -16.44%
- 5Y*
- -9.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
BGS vs. MKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -2.65% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -31.93% | -12.20% | -15.46% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | -27.49% | -8.33% | 13.97% | -15.68% | -12.65% | 2.67% | 14.70% | 23.65% | 39.01% | 11.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and MKC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2007 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
BGS:
$323.22M
MKC:
$13.19B
BGS:
-$0.96
MKC:
$6.10
BGS:
0.18
MKC:
1.85
BGS:
0.80
MKC:
1.89
BGS:
$1.81B
MKC:
$7.11B
BGS:
$388.44M
MKC:
$2.70B
BGS:
$91.70M
MKC:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGS vs. MKC — Risk / Return Rank
BGS
MKC
BGS vs. MKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGS | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.80 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.85 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | -1.69 | +2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGS vs. MKC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -86.50%, which is greater than MKC's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and MKC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGS | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.50% | -52.02% | -34.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.11% | -39.50% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.36% | -47.65% | -19.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -52.02% | -32.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.50% | -52.02% | -34.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.99% | -48.49% | -35.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -11.03% | -21.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.32% | 19.92% | -8.60% |
Volatility
BGS vs. MKC - Volatility Comparison
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) at 6.12%. This indicates that BGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGS | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 6.12% | +3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.85% | 23.28% | +10.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.42% | 28.06% | +23.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.32% | 24.34% | +24.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.31% | 24.17% | +22.14% |
Dividends
BGS vs. MKC - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.86%, more than MKC's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 18.86% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | 3.80% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.53% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
Financials
BGS vs. MKC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BGS vs. MKC - Profitability Comparison
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
MKC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
MKC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 227.50M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
MKC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BGS and MKC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGS has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to MKC (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGS dropped -86.50% vs MKC's -52.02%.
BGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGS and MKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer