BGRFX vs. TAAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX).
BGRFX is managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc.. It was launched on Dec 30, 1994. TAAGX is managed by Timothy Plan. It was launched on Oct 5, 2000.
Performance
BGRFX vs. TAAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGRFX vs. TAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | -12.11% | -14.51% | 4.62% | 14.68% | -22.55% | 19.82% | 32.77% | 40.18% | -2.93% | 27.14% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 10.71% | 16.01% | 25.45% | 26.46% | -25.98% | 17.90% | 36.11% | 27.71% | -12.17% | 19.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGRFX achieves a -12.11% return, which is significantly lower than TAAGX's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, BGRFX has underperformed TAAGX with an annualized return of 7.30%, while TAAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.
BGRFX
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- YTD
- -12.11%
- 6M
- -13.84%
- 1Y
- -21.46%
- 3Y*
- -5.79%
- 5Y*
- -4.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
TAAGX
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 48.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGRFX vs. TAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGRFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAGX's 1.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGRFX vs. TAAGX — Risk / Return Rank
BGRFX
TAAGX
BGRFX vs. TAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGRFX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | 2.01 | -3.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | 2.66 | -4.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.36 | -0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 4.06 | -4.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.76 | 17.43 | -19.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGRFX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | 2.01 | -3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.49 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.60 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.23 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGRFX and TAAGX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BGRFX vs. TAAGX - Dividend Comparison
BGRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.79%, more than TAAGX's 3.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | 23.79% | 20.91% | 12.05% | 1.79% | 6.02% | 7.73% | 4.64% | 3.68% | 8.38% | 11.68% | 12.84% | 9.53% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 3.10% | 3.44% | 8.81% | 3.12% | 3.06% | 8.89% | 5.75% | 0.00% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.71% |
Drawdowns
BGRFX vs. TAAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGRFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, smaller than the maximum TAAGX drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRFX and TAAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGRFX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -62.13% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.59% | -12.13% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.70% | -34.47% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.14% | -34.47% | -6.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.30% | -5.56% | -25.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -18.82% | +10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.94% | 2.83% | +9.11% |
Volatility
BGRFX vs. TAAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) is 5.53%, while Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that BGRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGRFX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 9.62% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 16.80% | -3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.24% | 24.69% | -3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 22.94% | -3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 22.02% | -1.05% |