BGRFX vs. GABGX
BGRFX (Baron Growth Fund) and GABGX (Gabelli Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - BGRFX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc., while GABGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Gabelli. Over the past 10 years, BGRFX returned 6.76%/yr vs 16.61%/yr for GABGX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGRFX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for GABGX.
Performance
BGRFX vs. GABGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGRFX achieves a -16.71% return, which is significantly lower than GABGX's 1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, BGRFX has underperformed GABGX with an annualized return of 6.76%, while GABGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.61% annualized return.
BGRFX
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -6.28%
- YTD
- -16.71%
- 6M
- -17.75%
- 1Y
- -24.91%
- 3Y*
- -7.28%
- 5Y*
- -6.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
GABGX
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 14.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 16.61%
BGRFX vs. GABGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | -16.71% | -14.51% | 4.62% | 14.68% | -22.55% | 19.82% | 32.77% | 40.18% | -2.93% | 27.14% |
GABGX Gabelli Growth Fund | 1.64% | 18.67% | 35.38% | 45.39% | -39.04% | 22.48% | 39.11% | 34.19% | 1.89% | 29.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGRFX and GABGX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 1995 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BGRFX and GABGX has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGRFX vs. GABGX — Risk / Return Rank
BGRFX
GABGX
BGRFX vs. GABGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) and Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGRFX | GABGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.17 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 0.94 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 3.15 | -4.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGRFX vs. GABGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGRFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, smaller than the maximum GABGX drawdown of -66.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRFX and GABGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGRFX | GABGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -66.39% | +10.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.19% | -16.53% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.90% | -22.39% | -10.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.90% | -42.36% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.14% | -42.36% | +1.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.90% | -5.05% | -29.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -16.67% | +7.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.93% | 4.89% | +11.04% |
Volatility
BGRFX vs. GABGX - Volatility Comparison
Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX) at 6.17%. This indicates that BGRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGRFX | GABGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 6.17% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.66% | 13.14% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 16.43% | +3.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 23.56% | -3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 22.58% | -1.38% |
BGRFX vs. GABGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGRFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GABGX's 1.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGRFX vs. GABGX - Dividend Comparison
BGRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.11%, more than GABGX's 5.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | 25.11% | 20.91% | 12.05% | 1.79% | 6.02% | 7.73% | 4.64% | 3.68% | 8.38% | 11.68% | 12.84% | 9.53% |
GABGX Gabelli Growth Fund | 5.40% | 5.49% | 6.27% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 5.03% | 7.02% | 11.48% | 5.66% | 6.28% | 5.17% | 8.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGRFX and GABGX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGRFX has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to GABGX (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGRFX dropped -56.10% vs GABGX's -66.39%.
GABGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGRFX and GABGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer