BGLTX vs. VMVFX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BGLTX (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund) and VMVFX (Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares) are both Global Equities funds. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGLTX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for VMVFX.

Performance

BGLTX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BGLTX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VMVFX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 6.71%
• YTD: 8.88%
• 1Y: 13.26%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: 10.35%
• 10Y*: 9.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLTX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund	-11.38%	16.38%	25.03%	36.61%	-46.09%	2.47%	102.05%	33.53%	-1.37%	54.04%
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares	8.88%	12.74%	13.38%	7.82%	-4.48%	23.74%	-3.99%	23.28%	-1.79%	15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLTX and VMVFX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between BGLTX and VMVFX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BGLTX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLTX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VMVFX

VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLTX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGLTX	VMVFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.97	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.50	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BGLTX	VMVFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.09%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.27%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.27%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.81%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.62%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BGLTX	VMVFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	7.02%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	10.77%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	12.43%	—

BGLTX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGLTX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison

BGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VMVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.84%	5.15%	8.39%	0.15%	10.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares	9.17%	9.98%	3.77%	3.05%	4.96%	12.73%	2.02%	5.12%	7.27%	2.30%	2.71%	3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGLTX and VMVFX in my portfolio?

BGLTX and VMVFX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.