PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGLTX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGLTX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BGLTX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GQFPX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-1.07%
6M
6.41%
YTD
7.88%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLTX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BGLTX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund
-11.38%16.38%25.03%36.61%-46.09%-9.03%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
7.88%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLTX and GQFPX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between BGLTX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGLTX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLTX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLTX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGLTXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.07

BGLTX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGLTX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGLTXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

Volatility

BGLTX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGLTXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.84%

BGLTX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGLTX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

BGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BGLTX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.84%5.15%8.39%0.15%10.07%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.71%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGLTX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGLTX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer