PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGETX vs. BGGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGETX vs. BGGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford International Growth Fund (BGETX) and Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGETX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than BGGSX's -4.80% return.


BGETX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.68%
YTD
4.44%
6M
4.51%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
-2.10%
10Y*
8.73%

BGGSX

1D
-1.77%
1M
4.13%
YTD
-4.80%
6M
-7.13%
1Y
-1.10%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
-3.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGETX vs. BGGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGETX
Baillie Gifford International Growth Fund
4.44%17.30%7.78%14.22%-34.40%-9.47%63.22%37.37%-17.30%20.18%
BGGSX
Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund
-4.80%10.25%30.44%45.93%-52.50%-11.13%125.42%30.00%8.31%16.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BGETX and BGGSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.69

The correlation between BGETX and BGGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGETX vs. BGGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGETX
BGETX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BGETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGETX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BGETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGETX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BGGSX
BGGSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BGGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BGGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGETX vs. BGGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford International Growth Fund (BGETX) and Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGETXBGGSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

-0.03

+0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.81

0.11

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.01

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

-0.02

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.77

-0.05

+1.82

BGETX vs. BGGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGETX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the BGGSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGETX and BGGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGETXBGGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

-0.03

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

-0.10

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.42

-0.06

Drawdowns

BGETX vs. BGGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGETX drawdown since its inception was -54.44%, smaller than the maximum BGGSX drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGETX and BGGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGETXBGGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.44%

-68.76%

+14.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

-26.08%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.59%

-30.87%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.52%

-67.71%

+16.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.39%

-30.41%

+10.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-25.16%

+6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

11.77%

-6.36%

Volatility

BGETX vs. BGGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baillie Gifford International Growth Fund (BGETX) is 4.89%, while Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that BGETX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGETXBGGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

5.60%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.94%

16.03%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.90%

21.43%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.97%

35.17%

-9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.99%

32.17%

-8.18%

BGETX vs. BGGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGETX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BGGSX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGETX vs. BGGSX - Dividend Comparison

BGETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, while BGGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGETX
Baillie Gifford International Growth Fund
5.19%5.42%7.29%0.39%0.62%16.03%10.22%1.12%10.73%0.40%
BGGSX
Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%16.38%2.61%3.29%1.35%2.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGETX and BGGSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGGSX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to BGETX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGETX dropped -54.44% vs BGGSX's -68.76%.

BGETX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGETX and BGGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer