BGLTX vs. AGLOX
BGLTX (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund) and AGLOX (Ariel Global Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BGLTX returned 14.94%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for AGLOX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGLTX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for AGLOX.
Performance
BGLTX vs. AGLOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGLTX achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than AGLOX's 24.60% return. Over the past 10 years, BGLTX has outperformed AGLOX with an annualized return of 14.94%, while AGLOX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.88% annualized return.
BGLTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -11.38%
- 6M
- -12.49%
- 1Y
- -8.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.94%
AGLOX
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 24.60%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 36.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
BGLTX vs. AGLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund | -11.38% | 16.38% | 25.03% | 36.61% | -46.09% | 2.47% | 102.05% | 33.53% | -1.37% | 54.04% |
AGLOX Ariel Global Fund | 24.60% | 23.22% | 6.55% | 12.40% | -5.47% | 11.53% | 7.70% | 15.98% | -6.03% | 15.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGLTX and AGLOX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between BGLTX and AGLOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGLTX vs. AGLOX — Risk / Return Rank
BGLTX
AGLOX
BGLTX vs. AGLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and Ariel Global Fund (AGLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGLTX | AGLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.54 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 3.71 | -3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 13.83 | -14.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGLTX vs. AGLOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGLTX drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, which is greater than AGLOX's maximum drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLTX and AGLOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGLTX | AGLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -24.72% | -45.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.64% | -10.66% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.28% | -12.94% | -14.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.17% | -16.77% | -53.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.17% | -24.72% | -45.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.45% | -1.67% | -16.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.03% | -3.37% | -12.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.25% | 2.85% | +8.40% |
Volatility
BGLTX vs. AGLOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) is 3.60%, while Ariel Global Fund (AGLOX) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that BGLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGLTX | AGLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 6.34% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 12.02% | +3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 14.11% | +6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.82% | 12.91% | +54.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.04% | 13.19% | +37.85% |
BGLTX vs. AGLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGLTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than AGLOX's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGLTX vs. AGLOX - Dividend Comparison
BGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGLOX Ariel Global Fund | 13.14% | 16.38% | 27.80% | 18.51% | 4.82% | 2.00% | 0.85% | 4.39% | 3.42% | 4.48% | 2.65% | 0.81% |
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 8.39% | 0.15% | 10.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGLTX and AGLOX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGLOX has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to BGLTX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGLTX dropped -70.17% vs AGLOX's -24.72%.
AGLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGLTX and AGLOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer