PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGITX vs. BGLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGITX vs. BGLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford International Alpha Fund (BGITX) and Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BGITX

1D
2.64%
1M
1.37%
6M
5.73%
YTD
8.61%
1Y
13.54%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
7.34%
ALL TIME*
7.77%

BGLTX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BGITX vs. BGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGITX
Baillie Gifford International Alpha Fund
8.61%19.51%5.03%18.77%-28.71%-0.72%26.59%32.17%-16.61%31.67%
BGLTX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund
-11.38%16.38%25.03%36.61%-46.09%2.47%102.05%33.53%-1.37%54.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BGITX and BGLTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.77

The correlation between BGITX and BGLTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGITX vs. BGLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BGITX
BGITX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BGITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGITX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BGITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGITX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLTX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BGITX vs. BGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford International Alpha Fund (BGITX) and Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGITXBGLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

BGITX vs. BGLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGITX vs. BGLTX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGITXBGLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

Volatility

BGITX vs. BGLTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGITXBGLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.03%

BGITX vs. BGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGITX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLTX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGITX vs. BGLTX - Dividend Comparison

BGITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.47%, while BGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGITX
Baillie Gifford International Alpha Fund
11.47%12.46%4.26%1.25%1.77%8.00%2.28%5.00%9.76%0.99%
BGLTX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.84%5.15%8.39%0.15%10.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGITX and BGLTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGITX and BGLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer