BGIA vs. BGGG
BGIA (Baillie Gifford International Alpha ETF) and BGGG (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BGIA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Baillie Gifford, while BGGG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Baillie Gifford. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGIA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BGGG.
Performance
BGIA vs. BGGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BGIA
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGGG
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGIA vs. BGGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BGIA Baillie Gifford International Alpha ETF | -2.53% |
BGGG Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF | -2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGIA and BGGG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGIA vs. BGGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford International Alpha ETF (BGIA) and Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGIA vs. BGGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGIA drawdown since its inception was -4.88%, smaller than the maximum BGGG drawdown of -9.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGIA and BGGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGIA | BGGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -9.83% | +4.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -2.89% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -5.06% | +2.72% |
Volatility
BGIA vs. BGGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGIA | BGGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.16% | 29.32% | -4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 29.32% | -4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 29.32% | -4.16% |
BGIA vs. BGGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGIA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BGGG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGIA vs. BGGG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BGIA nor BGGG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BGIA and BGGG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BGIA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BGIA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BGGG.
BGIA and BGGG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BGIA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BGGG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BGIA and 0.70% for BGGG.
Find the right allocation for BGIA and BGGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer