PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGGG vs. BGCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGGG vs. BGCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) and Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF (BGCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BGGG

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.20%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BGCG

1D
0.30%
1M
2.12%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGGG vs. BGCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BGGG and BGCG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2026

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGGG vs. BGCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) and Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF (BGCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BGGG vs. BGCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGGG vs. BGCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGGG drawdown since its inception was -9.83%, which is greater than BGCG's maximum drawdown of -5.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGG and BGCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGGGBGCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-5.68%

-4.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-0.34%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-2.43%

-2.63%

Volatility

BGGG vs. BGCG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGGGBGCGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.32%

27.54%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.32%

27.54%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.32%

27.54%

+1.78%

BGGG vs. BGCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGGG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BGCG's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGGG vs. BGCG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BGGG nor BGCG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, BGGG and BGCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BGGG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BGGG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for BGCG.

BGGG and BGCG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BGGG is categorized as Global Equities, while BGCG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BGGG and 0.72% for BGCG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGGG and BGCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer