PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGGG vs. BGEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGGG vs. BGEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) and Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF (BGEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BGGG

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.20%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BGEG

1D
-1.66%
1M
-6.98%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGGG vs. BGEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BGGG and BGEG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGGG vs. BGEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) and Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF (BGEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BGGG vs. BGEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGGG vs. BGEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGGG drawdown since its inception was -9.83%, which is greater than BGEG's maximum drawdown of -8.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGG and BGEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGGGBGEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-8.43%

-1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-7.15%

+4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-4.26%

-0.80%

Volatility

BGGG vs. BGEG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGGGBGEGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.32%

35.94%

-6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.32%

35.94%

-6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.32%

35.94%

-6.62%

BGGG vs. BGEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGGG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BGEG's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGGG vs. BGEG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BGGG nor BGEG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BGGG and BGEG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BGGG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BGGG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BGEG.

BGGG and BGEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BGGG is categorized as Global Equities, while BGEG is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BGGG and 0.79% for BGEG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGGG and BGEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer