BGIA vs. KEMX

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

BGIA (Baillie Gifford International Alpha ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BGIA is actively managed, while KEMX is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGIA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

BGIA vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford International Alpha ETF (BGIA) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BGIA

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEMX

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -4.57%
• 6M: 32.79%
• YTD: 35.75%
• 1Y: 58.22%
• 3Y*: 26.70%
• 5Y*: 13.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGIA vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BGIA Baillie Gifford International Alpha ETF	-2.53%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BGIA and KEMX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026	0.91

Return for Risk

BGIA vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGIA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 85
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGIA vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford International Alpha ETF (BGIA) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGIA	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.35	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.90	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.42	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.43	—

Drawdowns

BGIA vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGIA drawdown since its inception was -4.88%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGIA and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGIA	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-38.80%	+33.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.36%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.23%	-7.60%	+4.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-8.81%	+6.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BGIA	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.16%	25.48%	-0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.16%	19.04%	+6.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.16%	21.35%	+3.81%

BGIA vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGIA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGIA vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

BGIA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BGIA Baillie Gifford International Alpha ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.42%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGIA and KEMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, BGIA and KEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BGIA or KEMX?

On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BGIA or KEMX?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BGIA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BGIA or KEMX?

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.00% for BGIA.

What is the main difference between BGIA and KEMX?

They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BGIA and 0.25% for KEMX.