PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGGG vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGGG vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BGGG

1D
-1.99%
1M
-0.35%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POW

1D
1.39%
1M
-13.46%
6M
24.59%
YTD
37.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGGG vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BGGG and POW is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2026

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGGG vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BGGG vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGGG vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGGG drawdown since its inception was -9.83%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGG and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGGGPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-20.28%

+10.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-19.18%

+14.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-4.64%

+0.31%

Volatility

BGGG vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGGGPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.34%

33.00%

-6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.34%

33.00%

-6.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.34%

33.00%

-6.66%

BGGG vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGGG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGGG vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

BGGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BGGG and POW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BGGG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BGGG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for BGGG.

BGGG is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BGGG and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGGG and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer