BGCBX vs. BGLTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BGCBX (Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund) and BGLTX (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - BGCBX is a China Equities fund managed by Baillie Gifford Funds, while BGLTX is a Global Equities fund managed by Baillie Gifford Funds. Over the past 3 years, BGCBX returned 11.01%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for BGLTX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGCBX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for BGLTX.

Performance

BGCBX vs. BGLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX) and Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGCBX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than BGLTX's -11.38% return.

BGCBX

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 0.75%
• 1Y: 21.74%
• 3Y*: 11.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BGLTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.55%
• YTD: -11.38%
• 6M: -12.36%
• 1Y: -6.19%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: -0.95%
• 10Y*: 14.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGCBX vs. BGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund	0.72%	36.51%	9.74%	-18.00%	-28.56%	-17.30%
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund	-11.38%	16.38%	25.03%	36.61%	-46.09%	-5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BGCBX and BGLTX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2021	0.54

The correlation between BGCBX and BGLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BGCBX vs. BGLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGCBX

BGCBX Risk / Return Rank: 18
BGCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BGCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BGCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BGCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BGCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BGLTX

BGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 2
BGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGCBX vs. BGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX) and Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGCBX	BGLTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	-0.29	+1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	-0.27	+2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.97	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	-0.23	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	-0.53	+4.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGCBX vs. BGLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGCBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the BGLTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGCBX and BGLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGCBX	BGLTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	-0.29	+1.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	0.28	-0.51

Drawdowns

BGCBX vs. BGLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGCBX drawdown since its inception was -59.07%, smaller than the maximum BGLTX drawdown of -70.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGCBX and BGLTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGCBX	BGLTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.07%	-70.17%	+11.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.48%	-25.64%	+12.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.54%	-27.28%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-70.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.90%	-18.45%	-9.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.29%	-16.03%	-22.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.37%	11.19%	-5.82%

Volatility

BGCBX vs. BGLTX - Volatility Comparison

Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) at 3.65%. This indicates that BGCBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGCBX	BGLTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	3.65%	+1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.57%	15.67%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.11%	20.51%	-2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.04%	67.82%	-40.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.04%	51.05%	-24.01%

BGCBX vs. BGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGCBX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than BGLTX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGCBX vs. BGLTX - Dividend Comparison

BGCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while BGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund	0.91%	0.91%	2.03%	1.50%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.84%	5.15%	8.39%	0.15%	10.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGCBX and BGLTX in my portfolio?

BGCBX and BGLTX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGCBX or BGLTX?

BGCBX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to BGLTX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGCBX dropped -59.07% vs BGLTX's -70.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGCBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.