BG vs. STM
BG (Bunge Limited) and STM (STMicroelectronics N.V.) are both stocks. BG operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive), while STM operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BG returned 8.51%/yr vs 23.44%/yr for STM. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BG vs. STM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BG achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly lower than STM's 102.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BG has underperformed STM with an annualized return of 8.51%, while STM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.44% annualized return.
BG
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 1Y
- 36.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.10%
STM
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -25.92%
- 6M
- 88.59%
- YTD
- 102.77%
- 1Y
- 108.20%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 23.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $168.20M | $156.93M | $196.43M | |
| $760.73M | $779.02M | $847.43M |
BG vs. STM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BG Bunge Limited | 20.66% | 18.56% | -20.74% | 3.79% | 9.28% | 46.77% | 18.92% | 11.77% | -17.99% | -4.76% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 102.77% | 5.28% | -49.67% | 41.66% | -26.76% | 32.39% | 38.91% | 96.34% | -35.65% | 94.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between BG and STM is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2001 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BG and STM has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
BG:
$20.41B
STM:
$46.76B
BG:
$5.15
STM:
$0.49
BG:
20.65
STM:
106.24
BG:
0.23
STM:
3.78
BG:
1.31
STM:
2.76
BG:
$91.82B
STM:
$13.08B
BG:
$4.54B
STM:
$4.49B
BG:
$2.51B
STM:
$2.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BG vs. STM — Risk / Return Rank
BG
STM
BG vs. STM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunge Limited (BG) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BG | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.76 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.72 | 9.16 | -3.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BG vs. STM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BG drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, smaller than the maximum STM drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BG and STM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BG | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.34% | -94.40% | +17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.18% | -39.41% | +19.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -65.26% | +26.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.49% | -66.66% | +25.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.49% | -66.66% | +6.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.16% | -34.36% | +15.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -55.03% | +26.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.47% | 11.85% | -5.38% |
Volatility
BG vs. STM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bunge Limited (BG) is 12.25%, while STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a volatility of 28.39%. This indicates that BG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BG | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.25% | 28.39% | -16.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.14% | 51.19% | -29.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.79% | 59.10% | -27.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 47.04% | -17.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.10% | 45.13% | -14.03% |
Dividends
BG vs. STM - Dividend Comparison
BG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than STM's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BG Bunge Limited | 2.65% | 3.12% | 3.48% | 2.55% | 2.31% | 2.76% | 3.05% | 3.48% | 3.59% | 2.62% | 2.21% | 2.11% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 0.69% | 1.39% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.67% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 1.73% | 0.98% | 2.10% | 5.11% |
Financials
BG vs. STM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bunge Limited and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BG vs. STM - Profitability Comparison
BG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 24.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.0%.
STM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 3.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
BG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 24.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
STM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported an operating income of 220.00M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.
BG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported a net income of 678.00M and revenue of 24.04B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
STM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a net income of 222.00M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BG and STM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STM has higher volatility (28.39%) compared to BG (12.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BG dropped -77.34% vs STM's -94.40%.
STM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BG and STM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer