BG vs. SOYB
BG (Bunge Limited) is a stock, while SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) is Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark. Over the past 10 years, BG returned 9.82%/yr vs 2.13%/yr for SOYB. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BG vs. SOYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BG achieves a 29.85% return, which is significantly higher than SOYB's 15.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BG has outperformed SOYB with an annualized return of 9.82%, while SOYB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.13% annualized return.
BG
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -8.75%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- YTD
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 53.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
SOYB
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- YTD
- 15.14%
- 1Y
- 17.29%
- 3Y*
- -3.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.13%
BG vs. SOYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BG Bunge Limited | 29.85% | 18.56% | -20.74% | 3.79% | 9.28% | 46.77% | 18.92% | 11.77% | -17.99% | -4.76% |
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 15.14% | 1.77% | -20.48% | -5.23% | 25.27% | 16.85% | 22.99% | -2.16% | -9.51% | -6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BG and SOYB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BG vs. SOYB — Risk / Return Rank
BG
SOYB
BG vs. SOYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunge Limited (BG) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BG | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 1.92 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 5.02 | +4.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BG vs. SOYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BG drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, which is greater than SOYB's maximum drawdown of -53.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BG and SOYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BG | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.34% | -53.76% | -23.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.18% | -8.78% | -11.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -31.01% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.49% | -31.01% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.49% | -33.93% | -26.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.01% | -14.12% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.83% | -25.69% | -3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 3.36% | +2.44% |
Volatility
BG vs. SOYB - Volatility Comparison
Bunge Limited (BG) has a higher volatility of 9.66% compared to Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) at 4.42%. This indicates that BG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BG | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | 4.42% | +5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.94% | 9.47% | +11.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.89% | 12.93% | +17.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.36% | 17.14% | +12.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.04% | 16.80% | +14.24% |
Dividends
BG vs. SOYB - Dividend Comparison
BG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while SOYB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BG Bunge Limited | 2.47% | 3.12% | 3.48% | 2.55% | 2.31% | 2.76% | 3.05% | 3.48% | 3.59% | 2.62% | 2.21% | 2.11% |
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BG and SOYB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BG has higher volatility (9.66%) compared to SOYB (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BG dropped -77.34% vs SOYB's -53.76%.
BG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BG and SOYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer