PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BG vs. FRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BG vs. FRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bunge Limited (BG) and Frontline Ltd. (FRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BG achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly lower than FRO's 94.26% return. Over the past 10 years, BG has underperformed FRO with an annualized return of 8.51%, while FRO has yielded a comparatively higher 26.54% annualized return.


BG

1D
1.10%
1M
1.28%
6M
-5.62%
YTD
20.66%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
2.24%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
8.51%
ALL TIME*
10.10%

FRO

1D
0.69%
1M
13.46%
6M
48.31%
YTD
94.26%
1Y
135.73%
3Y*
45.97%
5Y*
49.01%
10Y*
26.54%
ALL TIME*
7.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$168.20M$156.93M$196.43M
$66.00M$77.57M$107.06M

BG vs. FRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BG
Bunge Limited
20.66%18.56%-20.74%3.79%9.28%46.77%18.92%11.77%-17.99%-4.76%
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
94.26%61.17%-22.48%96.23%73.67%13.67%-41.47%134.59%20.48%-32.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BG and FRO is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2001

0.24

The correlation between BG and FRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BG:

$20.41B

FRO:

$8.76B

EPS

BG:

$5.15

FRO:

$4.06

PE Ratio

BG:

20.65

FRO:

9.69

PS Ratio

BG:

0.23

FRO:

3.89

PB Ratio

BG:

1.31

FRO:

3.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

BG:

$91.82B

FRO:

$2.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BG:

$4.54B

FRO:

$933.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

BG:

$2.51B

FRO:

$1.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BG vs. FRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BG
BG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FRO
FRO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BG vs. FRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunge Limited (BG) and Frontline Ltd. (FRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGFRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

6.38

-4.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

16.21

-10.48

BG vs. FRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BG Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the FRO Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BG and FRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BG vs. FRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BG drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, smaller than the maximum FRO drawdown of -98.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BG and FRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGFRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.34%

-98.36%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.18%

-21.41%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.82%

-52.04%

+13.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.49%

-52.04%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.49%

-52.04%

-8.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.16%

-69.74%

+50.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-67.85%

+39.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.47%

8.41%

-1.94%

Volatility

BG vs. FRO - Volatility Comparison

Bunge Limited (BG) and Frontline Ltd. (FRO) have volatilities of 12.25% and 12.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGFRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.25%

12.24%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.14%

33.26%

-11.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.79%

43.30%

-11.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.58%

49.77%

-20.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.10%

51.17%

-20.07%

Dividends

BG vs. FRO - Dividend Comparison

BG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than FRO's 7.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BG
Bunge Limited
2.65%3.12%3.48%2.55%2.31%2.76%3.05%3.48%3.59%2.62%2.21%2.11%
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
7.95%4.26%13.74%14.31%1.24%0.00%25.72%0.78%0.00%6.54%19.83%1.67%

Financials

BG vs. FRO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bunge Limited and Frontline Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BG vs. FRO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bunge Limited and Frontline Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 24.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.0%.

FRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a gross profit of 395.96M and revenue of 714.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

BG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 24.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

FRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported an operating income of 370.04M and revenue of 714.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.8%.

BG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported a net income of 678.00M and revenue of 24.04B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

FRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a net income of 559.12M and revenue of 714.24M, resulting in a net margin of 78.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BG and FRO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BG has higher volatility (12.25%) compared to FRO (12.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BG dropped -77.34% vs FRO's -98.36%.

FRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BG and FRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer