PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFRZ vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFRZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFRZ achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's 1.05% return.


BFRZ

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-1.04%
1Y
5.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTZ

1D
19.27%
1M
186.45%
YTD
1.05%
6M
9.89%
1Y
279.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFRZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFRZ and MSTZ is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025

-0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFRZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFRZ
BFRZ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BFRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BFRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFRZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFRZMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.31

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.29

6.57

-2.28

BFRZ vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFRZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFRZ and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFRZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFRZ drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFRZ and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFRZMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-99.38%

+96.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-84.89%

+81.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-96.56%

+94.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-94.46%

+93.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

42.70%

-41.52%

Volatility

BFRZ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) is 2.63%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 46.08%. This indicates that BFRZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFRZMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

46.08%

-43.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.25%

129.73%

-125.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.59%

145.84%

-140.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.32%

170.65%

-165.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.32%

170.65%

-165.33%

BFRZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFRZ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFRZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

BFRZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFRZ and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (46.08%) compared to BFRZ (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFRZ dropped -3.12% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 279.21% vs 5.05% for BFRZ. On fees, BFRZ is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, BFRZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 279.21% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BFRZ is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

BFRZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

BFRZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BFRZ and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFRZ and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer