PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFRZ vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFRZ vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFRZ achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 11.07% return.


BFRZ

1D
0.05%
1M
3.03%
YTD
1.92%
6M
2.03%
1Y
8.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAPR

1D
0.05%
1M
2.18%
YTD
11.07%
6M
12.12%
1Y
20.78%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFRZ vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFRZ and BAPR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.60

The correlation between BFRZ and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFRZ vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFRZ
BFRZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BFRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BFRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFRZ vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFRZBAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

3.71

-1.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

6.31

-3.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.91

-0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

10.95

-8.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

60.46

-52.52

BFRZ vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFRZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFRZ and BAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFRZBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

3.71

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.85

0.84

+1.01

Drawdowns

BFRZ vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFRZ drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFRZ and BAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFRZBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-23.91%

+20.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-1.93%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-2.60%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.35%

+0.75%

Volatility

BFRZ vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) have volatilities of 1.05% and 1.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFRZBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.07%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.70%

4.52%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

5.63%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.87%

11.49%

-6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.87%

13.12%

-8.25%

BFRZ vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFRZ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFRZ vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

BFRZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFRZ and BAPR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAPR has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to BFRZ (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFRZ dropped -3.12% vs BAPR's -23.91%.

On 1-year performance, BAPR leads with 20.78% vs 8.65% for BFRZ. On fees, BAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 20.78% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BFRZ.

BFRZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for BAPR.

Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BFRZ and 0.79% for BAPR.

BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFRZ and BAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer