BFOR vs. GARP
BFOR (ALPS Barron's 400 ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFOR is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Barron's 400 Index, while GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BFOR returned 9.98%/yr vs 20.26%/yr for GARP. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFOR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
BFOR vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOR achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 21.29% return.
BFOR
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
GARP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 21.80%
- 1Y
- 43.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.60%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- —
BFOR vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 9.89% | 13.85% | 17.81% | 18.19% | -15.92% | 30.71% | 15.30% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 21.29% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFOR and GARP is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between BFOR and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
BFOR vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BFOR
GARP
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
BFOR
GARP
Technology
BFOR
GARP
Industrials
BFOR
GARP
Healthcare
BFOR
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
BFOR
GARP
Energy
BFOR
GARP
Consumer Defensive
BFOR
GARP
-
Communication Services
BFOR
GARP
Basic Materials
BFOR
GARP
Utilities
BFOR
GARP
Real Estate
BFOR
-
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFOR vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
BFOR
GARP
BFOR vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFOR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 2.45 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 3.18 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.41 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 3.20 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | 12.85 | -3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFOR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.45 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.93 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.90 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
BFOR vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOR drawdown since its inception was -41.27%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOR and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFOR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.27% | -31.34% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -13.69% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.91% | -23.73% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -30.61% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.73% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -7.36% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 3.40% | -0.95% |
Volatility
BFOR vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) is 3.52%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that BFOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFOR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 5.03% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 13.89% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 17.89% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 21.97% | -2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 23.89% | -3.48% |
BFOR vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFOR vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
BFOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than GARP's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.69% | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.86% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFOR and GARP have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to BFOR (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFOR dropped -41.27% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.26% vs 9.98% for BFOR. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BFOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.26% return vs 9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BFOR.
BFOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.
BFOR is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. BFOR tracks Barron's 400 Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BFOR and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFOR and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer