BFLBY vs. HYMC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BFLBY (Bilfinger SE ADR) and HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) are both stocks. BFLBY operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, BFLBY returned 33.29%/yr vs -4.90%/yr for HYMC. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BFLBY vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bilfinger SE ADR (BFLBY) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFLBY achieves a -21.00% return, which is significantly lower than HYMC's 5.38% return.

BFLBY

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: -6.73%
• YTD: -21.00%
• 6M: -23.66%
• 1Y: 10.09%
• 3Y*: 46.16%
• 5Y*: 33.29%
• 10Y*: 18.12%

HYMC

• 1D: -3.69%
• 1M: -22.49%
• YTD: 5.38%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 647.76%
• 3Y*: 99.81%
• 5Y*: -4.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFLBY vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BFLBY Bilfinger SE ADR	-21.00%	172.63%	30.91%	32.77%	4.46%	17.02%	-12.56%	25.44%	-35.88%
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	5.38%	975.57%	-9.80%	-53.96%	-13.30%	-92.18%	-24.03%	4.59%	3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BFLBY and HYMC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018	0.08

The correlation between BFLBY and HYMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap BFLBY : $3.53B HYMC : $2.25B
EPS BFLBY : €0.97 HYMC : -$1.64
PB Ratio BFLBY : 2.22 HYMC : 10.04
Total Revenue (TTM) BFLBY : €5.46B HYMC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) BFLBY : €614.38M HYMC : -$4.65M
EBITDA (TTM) BFLBY : €340.87M HYMC : -$69.17M

Return for Risk

BFLBY vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFLBY

BFLBY Risk / Return Rank: 50
BFLBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BFLBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BFLBY Omega Ratio Rank: 52
BFLBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BFLBY Martin Ratio Rank: 50

HYMC

HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 97
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFLBY vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilfinger SE ADR (BFLBY) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFLBY	HYMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	5.54	-5.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	4.19	-3.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.50	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.27	11.12	-10.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.64	28.21	-27.58

BFLBY vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFLBY Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 5.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFLBY and HYMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BFLBY vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFLBY drawdown since its inception was -86.86%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLBY and HYMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFLBY	HYMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.86%	-98.89%	+12.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.19%	-58.77%	+20.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.19%	-63.45%	+25.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.19%	-94.45%	+56.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.11%	-84.17%	+47.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.99%	-63.41%	+22.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.90%	23.14%	-7.24%

Volatility

BFLBY vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bilfinger SE ADR (BFLBY) is 10.05%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 24.25%. This indicates that BFLBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFLBY	HYMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	24.25%	-14.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.89%	95.62%	-48.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.92%	118.15%	-57.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.87%	152.73%	-104.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.73%	122.88%	-75.15%

Dividends

BFLBY vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

BFLBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, while HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFLBY Bilfinger SE ADR	3.44%	2.17%	4.07%	3.69%	17.33%	6.67%	2.62%	1.99%	2.71%	4.25%	0.00%	4.80%
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFLBY and HYMC in my portfolio?

BFLBY and HYMC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFLBY or HYMC?

HYMC has higher volatility (24.25%) compared to BFLBY (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFLBY dropped -86.86% vs HYMC's -98.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.54 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.