PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFLBY vs. SII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BFLBY vs. SII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bilfinger SE ADR (BFLBY) and Sprott Inc (SII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFLBY achieves a -21.00% return, which is significantly lower than SII's 21.26% return.


BFLBY

1D
-2.31%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
-21.00%
6M
-23.66%
1Y
10.09%
3Y*
46.16%
5Y*
33.29%
10Y*
18.12%

SII

1D
-3.43%
1M
-5.48%
YTD
21.26%
6M
18.66%
1Y
83.16%
3Y*
58.45%
5Y*
27.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFLBY vs. SII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BFLBY
Bilfinger SE ADR
-21.00%172.63%30.91%32.77%4.46%17.02%54.36%
SII
Sprott Inc
21.26%137.17%27.39%5.00%-24.09%59.43%-19.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BFLBY and SII is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2020

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BFLBY:

$3.53B

SII:

$2.19B

EPS

BFLBY:

€0.97

SII:

$3.53

PE Ratio

BFLBY:

17.15

SII:

33.48

PEG Ratio

BFLBY:

0.13

SII:

0.90

PS Ratio

BFLBY:

0.57

SII:

7.50

PB Ratio

BFLBY:

2.22

SII:

5.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

BFLBY:

€5.46B

SII:

$377.77M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BFLBY:

€614.38M

SII:

$278.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

BFLBY:

€340.87M

SII:

$120.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFLBY vs. SII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFLBY
BFLBY Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BFLBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFLBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFLBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BFLBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFLBY Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SII
SII Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SII Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SII Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SII Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SII Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFLBY vs. SII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilfinger SE ADR (BFLBY) and Sprott Inc (SII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFLBYSIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.30

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

2.61

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.64

6.91

-6.28

BFLBY vs. SII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFLBY Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the SII Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFLBY and SII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFLBY vs. SII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFLBY drawdown since its inception was -86.86%, which is greater than SII's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLBY and SII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFLBYSIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.86%

-47.81%

-39.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.19%

-32.00%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.19%

-32.00%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.19%

-47.81%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.11%

-28.82%

-8.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.99%

-21.10%

-19.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.90%

12.07%

+3.83%

Volatility

BFLBY vs. SII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bilfinger SE ADR (BFLBY) is 10.05%, while Sprott Inc (SII) has a volatility of 14.75%. This indicates that BFLBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFLBYSIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.05%

14.75%

-4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.89%

41.19%

+5.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.92%

47.93%

+12.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.87%

37.86%

+10.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.73%

37.84%

+9.89%

Dividends

BFLBY vs. SII - Dividend Comparison

BFLBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than SII's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFLBY
Bilfinger SE ADR
3.44%2.17%4.07%3.69%17.33%6.67%2.62%1.99%2.71%4.25%0.00%4.80%
SII
Sprott Inc
1.27%1.33%2.49%2.95%3.00%2.22%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BFLBY vs. SII - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bilfinger SE ADR and Sprott Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.31B
143.35M
(BFLBY) Total Revenue
(SII) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BFLBY values in EUR, SII values in USD

BFLBY vs. SII - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bilfinger SE ADR and Sprott Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
10.8%
91.6%
Portfolio components
BFLBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilfinger SE ADR reported a gross profit of 142.00M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

SII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported a gross profit of 131.24M and revenue of 143.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.

BFLBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilfinger SE ADR reported an operating income of 56.60M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

SII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported an operating income of 41.26M and revenue of 143.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

BFLBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilfinger SE ADR reported a net income of 36.70M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

SII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported a net income of 28.81M and revenue of 143.35M, resulting in a net margin of 20.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFLBY and SII have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SII has higher volatility (14.75%) compared to BFLBY (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFLBY dropped -86.86% vs SII's -47.81%.

SII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFLBY and SII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer