BFAP vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFAP is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BFAP returned -30.33% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.80, they often move in opposite directions. BFAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

BFAP vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BFAP having a -22.34% return and MSTZ slightly lower at -23.27%.

BFAP

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -0.85%
• 6M: -24.95%
• YTD: -22.34%
• 1Y: -30.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFAP vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	-22.34%	8.90%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	22.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BFAP and MSTZ is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	-0.80

The correlation between BFAP and MSTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.82 to -0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BFAP vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFAP

BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 1
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFAP vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFAP	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.42	1.92	-3.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.03	2.45	-4.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.32	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	3.35	-4.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	6.53	-8.06

BFAP vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFAP Sharpe Ratio is -1.42, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFAP and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BFAP vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -34.15%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFAP	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.15%	-99.38%	+65.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.15%	-84.89%	+50.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.51%	-97.39%	+64.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.50%	-94.53%	+82.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.84%	43.51%	-23.67%

Volatility

BFAP vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) is 4.71%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that BFAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFAP	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	56.56%	-51.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.46%	135.11%	-118.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.49%	148.53%	-127.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.28%	171.02%	-150.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.28%	171.02%	-150.74%

BFAP vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFAP vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.43%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	24.43%	18.97%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFAP and MSTZ in my portfolio?

BFAP and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFAP or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to BFAP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAP dropped -34.15% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, BFAP or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs -30.33% for BFAP. On fees, BFAP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BFAP or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs -30.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFAP or MSTZ?

BFAP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFAP or MSTZ?

BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 24.43%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between BFAP and MSTZ?

BFAP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.