BETZ vs. YBTC
BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while YBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Roundhill. BETZ is passively managed, while YBTC is actively managed. Over the past year, BETZ returned -16.95% vs -40.21% for YBTC. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YBTC.
Performance
BETZ vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -8.87% return, which is significantly higher than YBTC's -23.96% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
YBTC
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- 6M
- -20.57%
- YTD
- -23.96%
- 1Y
- -40.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.48K | $310.34K | $782.30K | |
| $1.21M | $1.11M | $1.55M |
BETZ vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -8.87% | 15.75% | 17.32% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -23.96% | -4.23% | 55.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and YBTC is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
YBTC
BETZ vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETZ | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.81 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.87 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | -1.35 | +0.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than YBTC's maximum drawdown of -48.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and YBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -48.84% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -48.84% | +19.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.35% | -44.47% | +6.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -14.91% | -18.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.92% | 31.35% | -12.43% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 5.96%, while Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 7.65% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 31.73% | -14.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.17% | 40.25% | -19.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 40.45% | -13.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.85% | 40.45% | -12.60% |
BETZ vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETZ vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than YBTC's 80.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.02% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 80.99% | 76.04% | 44.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETZ and YBTC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YBTC has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to BETZ (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs YBTC's -48.84%.
On 1-year performance, BETZ leads with -16.95% vs -40.21% for YBTC. On fees, BETZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BETZ has performed better with a -16.95% return vs -40.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BETZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YBTC.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 80.99%, compared with 5.02% for BETZ.
BETZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while YBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.95% for YBTC.
BETZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.83 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETZ and YBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer