BETZ vs. SGHC
BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while SGHC (Super Group (SGHC) Limited) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, BETZ returned 5.42%/yr vs 57.63%/yr for SGHC. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BETZ vs. SGHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -10.44% return, which is significantly lower than SGHC's 16.57% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- -10.44%
- 6M
- -10.50%
- 1Y
- -12.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- -8.72%
- 10Y*
- —
SGHC
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 16.57%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 43.67%
- 3Y*
- 57.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETZ vs. SGHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -10.44% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -29.46% |
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 16.57% | 95.00% | 107.65% | 5.67% | -65.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and SGHC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.50 |
The correlation between BETZ and SGHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. SGHC — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
SGHC
BETZ vs. SGHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETZ | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.19 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 1.16 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 2.67 | -3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. SGHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, smaller than the maximum SGHC drawdown of -76.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and SGHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -76.02% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -37.67% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | -37.67% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.41% | -2.67% | -36.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.82% | -45.27% | +11.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.59% | 16.39% | +1.20% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. SGHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 6.83%, while Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 10.65% | -3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.62% | 30.74% | -14.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 46.21% | -25.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.00% | 59.36% | -32.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.95% | 59.36% | -31.41% |
Dividends
BETZ vs. SGHC - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than SGHC's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.11% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 3.20% | 1.34% | 4.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETZ and SGHC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGHC has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to BETZ (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs SGHC's -76.02%.
SGHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETZ and SGHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer