PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETZ vs. KLXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BETZ vs. KLXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BETZ vs. KLXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
-14.85%15.75%10.22%0.93%
KLXY
Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF
-0.86%13.69%-6.39%2.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -14.85% return, which is significantly lower than KLXY's -0.86% return.


BETZ

1D
3.13%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-14.85%
6M
-21.76%
1Y
-0.63%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
-9.64%
10Y*

KLXY

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
3.72%
1Y
16.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BETZ vs. KLXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KLXY's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BETZ vs. KLXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

KLXY
KLXY Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
KLXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLXY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
KLXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLXY Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETZ vs. KLXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BETZKLXYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.03

0.50

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.13

0.88

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.11

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

0.63

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.14

2.48

-2.63

BETZ vs. KLXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the KLXY Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETZ and KLXY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BETZKLXYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

0.50

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.15

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and KLXY is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BETZ vs. KLXY - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than KLXY's 0.85% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
5.37%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%
KLXY
Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF
0.85%0.84%0.74%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BETZ vs. KLXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than KLXY's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and KLXY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BETZKLXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.82%

-26.57%

-34.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.20%

-14.06%

-15.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.39%

-3.20%

-39.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-8.13%

-25.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.06%

4.07%

+9.99%

Volatility

BETZ vs. KLXY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY) at 3.97%. This indicates that BETZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BETZKLXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

3.97%

+4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.98%

12.89%

+3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

23.28%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.27%

20.80%

+6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.13%

20.80%

+7.33%