BETZ vs. KLXY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and KLXY (Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - BETZ tracks the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index while KLXY tracks the Solactive Global Luxury Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KLXY.

Performance

BETZ vs. KLXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BETZ

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: -9.29%
• 6M: -6.63%
• 1Y: -5.17%
• 3Y*: 5.35%
• 5Y*: -8.45%
• 10Y*: —

KLXY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETZ vs. KLXY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	-9.29%	15.75%	10.22%	0.93%
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF	-0.86%	13.69%	-6.39%	2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and KLXY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2023	0.52

The correlation between BETZ and KLXY shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BETZ vs. KLXY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BETZ	KLXY
Consumer Cyclical	96.4%	73.2%
Technology	2.8%	-
Communication Services	0.8%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	21.8%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	4.9%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BETZ vs. KLXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETZ

BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 6
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETZ vs. KLXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BETZ	KLXY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.38	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BETZ	KLXY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BETZ	KLXY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.64%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.81%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BETZ	KLXY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.49%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.95%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.95%	—	—

BETZ vs. KLXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KLXY's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETZ vs. KLXY - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than KLXY's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	5.04%	4.57%	0.86%	0.00%	0.66%	0.00%	0.28%
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF	0.85%	0.84%	0.74%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETZ and KLXY in my portfolio?

BETZ and KLXY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BETZ or KLXY?

On fees, KLXY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETZ or KLXY?

KLXY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETZ or KLXY?

BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 0.85% for KLXY.

What is the main difference between BETZ and KLXY?

BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while KLXY tracks Solactive Global Luxury Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.69% for KLXY.