BESO vs. EZPZ
BESO (GSR Crypto Core3 ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BESO is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BESO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
BESO vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BESO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 14.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 7.00%
- 6M
- -35.15%
- YTD
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -41.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESO vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BESO GSR Crypto Core3 ETF | -2.19% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -15.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BESO and EZPZ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BESO vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
BESO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZPZ
BESO vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSR Crypto Core3 ETF (BESO) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BESO | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BESO vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BESO drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BESO and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BESO | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.08% | -56.63% | +38.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -52.69% | +47.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -23.71% | +14.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 34.36% | — |
Volatility
BESO vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BESO | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.31% | 47.89% | -5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.31% | 47.68% | -5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.31% | 47.68% | -5.37% |
BESO vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BESO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BESO vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BESO nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BESO and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BESO.
BESO and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GSR and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BESO and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for BESO and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer