BESO vs. SOEZ
BESO (GSR Crypto Core3 ETF) and SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BESO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOEZ.
Performance
BESO vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BESO
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOEZ
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- 6M
- -46.66%
- YTD
- -37.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESO vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BESO GSR Crypto Core3 ETF | -3.63% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | -10.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BESO and SOEZ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BESO vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSR Crypto Core3 ETF (BESO) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BESO vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BESO drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum SOEZ drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BESO and SOEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BESO | SOEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.08% | -56.14% | +38.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -47.56% | +40.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -34.20% | +25.18% |
Volatility
BESO vs. SOEZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BESO | SOEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.75% | 69.98% | -28.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.75% | 69.98% | -28.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.75% | 69.98% | -28.23% |
BESO vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BESO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BESO vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison
BESO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BESO GSR Crypto Core3 ETF | 0.00% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BESO and SOEZ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BESO.
SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for BESO.
They also come from different issuers: GSR and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BESO and 0.19% for SOEZ.
Find the right allocation for BESO and SOEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer