BESO vs. SBIT
BESO (GSR Crypto Core3 ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BESO is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. BESO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
BESO vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BESO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 14.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -13.60%
- 6M
- 55.17%
- YTD
- 37.78%
- 1Y
- 78.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESO vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BESO GSR Crypto Core3 ETF | -2.19% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 28.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BESO and SBIT is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | -0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BESO vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
BESO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SBIT
BESO vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSR Crypto Core3 ETF (BESO) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BESO | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BESO vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BESO drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BESO and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BESO | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.08% | -91.35% | +73.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -78.13% | +72.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -68.77% | +59.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.91% | — |
Volatility
BESO vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BESO | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 69.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.31% | 88.71% | -46.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.31% | 97.07% | -54.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.31% | 97.07% | -54.76% |
BESO vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BESO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BESO vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
BESO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BESO GSR Crypto Core3 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 4.15% | 0.52% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BESO and SBIT have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BESO.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 0.00% for BESO.
They also come from different issuers: GSR and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BESO and 0.95% for SBIT.
Find the right allocation for BESO and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer