BERZ vs. TZA
BERZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and TZA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BERZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive FANG Innovation Index, while TZA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BERZ returned -75.61%/yr vs -47.24%/yr for TZA. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BERZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for TZA.
Performance
BERZ vs. TZA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BERZ achieves a -60.32% return, which is significantly lower than TZA's -47.43% return.
BERZ
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- YTD
- -60.32%
- 6M
- -58.94%
- 1Y
- -83.28%
- 3Y*
- -75.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TZA
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -14.44%
- YTD
- -47.43%
- 6M
- -42.41%
- 1Y
- -69.35%
- 3Y*
- -47.24%
- 5Y*
- -31.37%
- 10Y*
- -44.28%
BERZ vs. TZA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -60.32% | -78.81% | -65.95% | -89.12% | 102.85% | -28.36% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | -47.43% | -40.22% | -32.22% | -41.19% | 30.21% | -18.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BERZ and TZA is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021 | 0.69 |
The correlation between BERZ and TZA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BERZ vs. TZA — Risk / Return Rank
BERZ
TZA
BERZ vs. TZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BERZ | TZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.76 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -1.02 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | -1.60 | +0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BERZ vs. TZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BERZ drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum TZA drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERZ and TZA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BERZ | TZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -100.00% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.55% | -68.23% | -17.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.87% | -89.28% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.76% | -100.00% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.79% | -97.99% | +26.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.40% | 45.01% | +10.39% |
Volatility
BERZ vs. TZA - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a higher volatility of 32.14% compared to Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) at 19.05%. This indicates that BERZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BERZ | TZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.14% | 19.05% | +13.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.10% | 42.78% | +20.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.60% | 58.69% | +21.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.68% | 67.66% | +25.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.68% | 69.07% | +23.61% |
BERZ vs. TZA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BERZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TZA's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
BERZ vs. TZA - Dividend Comparison
BERZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | 5.46% | 5.08% | 5.40% | 5.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.56% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BERZ and TZA have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BERZ has higher volatility (32.14%) compared to TZA (19.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERZ dropped -99.80% vs TZA's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, TZA leads with -47.24% vs -75.61% for BERZ. On fees, BERZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TZA has been the lower-risk option at 19.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TZA has performed better with a -47.24% return vs -75.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BERZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.
TZA has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 0.00% for BERZ.
BERZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TZA is Leveraged Equities. BERZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation Index, while TZA tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BERZ and 1.11% for TZA.
BERZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.04 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BERZ and TZA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer