BERZ vs. TSLZ
BERZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. BERZ is passively managed, while TSLZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BERZ returned -78.37% vs -52.57% for TSLZ. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BERZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BERZ achieves a -54.07% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's 14.62% return.
BERZ
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- -54.07%
- 6M
- -51.33%
- 1Y
- -78.37%
- 3Y*
- -74.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- 21.75%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 6M
- 32.94%
- 1Y
- -52.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -54.07% | -78.81% | -65.95% | -44.49% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 14.62% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -24.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BERZ and TSLZ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 0.61 |
The correlation between BERZ and TSLZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BERZ vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
BERZ
TSLZ
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BERZ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.93 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.72 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -0.92 | -0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BERZ drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERZ and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BERZ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -99.11% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.60% | -72.88% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.72% | -98.80% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.83% | -75.74% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.07% | 57.36% | -5.29% |
Volatility
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a higher volatility of 34.25% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) at 27.35%. This indicates that BERZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BERZ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.25% | 27.35% | +6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.61% | 56.82% | +6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.43% | 86.63% | -5.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.78% | 116.81% | -24.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.78% | 116.81% | -24.03% |
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BERZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
BERZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.60% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BERZ and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BERZ has higher volatility (34.25%) compared to TSLZ (27.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERZ dropped -99.80% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.
On 1-year performance, TSLZ leads with -52.57% vs -78.37% for BERZ. On fees, BERZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 27.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLZ has performed better with a -52.57% return vs -78.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BERZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for BERZ.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BERZ and 1.05% for TSLZ.
TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BERZ and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer