BERZ vs. TSLZ
BERZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. BERZ is passively managed, while TSLZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BERZ returned -86.22% vs -64.19% for TSLZ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BERZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BERZ achieves a -65.19% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -5.69% return.
BERZ
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- -37.37%
- YTD
- -65.19%
- 6M
- -64.50%
- 1Y
- -86.22%
- 3Y*
- -77.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -17.84%
- YTD
- -5.69%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- 1Y
- -64.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -65.19% | -78.81% | -65.95% | -44.33% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.69% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -28.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BERZ and TSLZ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.60 |
The correlation between BERZ and TSLZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BERZ vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
BERZ
TSLZ
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BERZ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 0.90 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.84 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | -1.06 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BERZ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.14 | -0.70 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | -0.67 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BERZ drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERZ and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BERZ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -99.11% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.32% | -76.62% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.79% | -99.01% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.57% | -75.36% | +3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.07% | 60.60% | -4.53% |
Volatility
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) have volatilities of 23.63% and 24.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BERZ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.63% | 24.09% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.98% | 54.94% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.77% | 91.64% | -15.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.20% | 117.04% | -24.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.20% | 117.04% | -24.84% |
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BERZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BERZ vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
BERZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BERZ and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLZ has higher volatility (24.09%) compared to BERZ (23.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERZ dropped -99.80% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.
On 1-year performance, TSLZ leads with -64.19% vs -86.22% for BERZ. On fees, BERZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BERZ has been the lower-risk option at 23.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLZ has performed better with a -64.19% return vs -86.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BERZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for BERZ.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BERZ and 1.05% for TSLZ.
TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BERZ and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer