BERZ vs. SEF
BERZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - BERZ tracks the Solactive FANG Innovation Index while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BERZ returned -77.59%/yr vs -10.34%/yr for SEF. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
BERZ vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BERZ achieves a -65.19% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 8.89% return.
BERZ
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- -37.37%
- YTD
- -65.19%
- 6M
- -64.50%
- 1Y
- -86.22%
- 3Y*
- -77.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
BERZ vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -65.19% | -78.81% | -65.95% | -89.12% | 102.85% | -30.19% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 8.89% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between BERZ and SEF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2021 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BERZ and SEF has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BERZ vs. SEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BERZ
SEF
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
BERZ
SEF
-
Communication Services
BERZ
SEF
-
Financial Services
BERZ
SEF
Consumer Cyclical
BERZ
SEF
-
Basic Materials
BERZ
-
SEF
-
Consumer Defensive
BERZ
-
SEF
-
Energy
BERZ
-
SEF
-
Healthcare
BERZ
-
SEF
-
Industrials
BERZ
-
SEF
-
Real Estate
BERZ
-
SEF
-
Utilities
BERZ
-
SEF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BERZ vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
BERZ
SEF
BERZ vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BERZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 1.06 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 0.39 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 0.73 | -2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BERZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.14 | 0.26 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | -0.49 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
BERZ vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BERZ drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERZ and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BERZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -96.51% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.32% | -9.72% | -77.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.97% | -39.40% | -59.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.79% | -96.09% | -3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.57% | -82.72% | +11.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.07% | 5.14% | +50.93% |
Volatility
BERZ vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a higher volatility of 23.63% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 3.01%. This indicates that BERZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BERZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.63% | 3.01% | +20.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.98% | 10.85% | +47.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.77% | 14.34% | +61.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.20% | 17.96% | +74.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.20% | 20.52% | +71.68% |
BERZ vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BERZ and SEF have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
BERZ vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
BERZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.35% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BERZ and SEF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BERZ has higher volatility (23.63%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERZ dropped -99.80% vs SEF's -96.51%.
On 3-year performance, SEF leads with -10.34% vs -77.59% for BERZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEF has performed better with a -10.34% return vs -77.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BERZ and SEF have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for BERZ.
BERZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation Index, while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and ProShares.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BERZ and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer