PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BERZ vs. SEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BERZ vs. SEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BERZ achieves a -65.19% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 8.89% return.


BERZ

1D
3.73%
1M
-37.37%
YTD
-65.19%
6M
-64.50%
1Y
-86.22%
3Y*
-77.59%
5Y*
10Y*

SEF

1D
1.10%
1M
1.81%
YTD
8.89%
6M
6.43%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
-10.34%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*
-11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BERZ vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BERZ
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
-65.19%-78.81%-65.95%-89.12%102.85%-30.19%
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
8.89%-9.82%-17.81%-8.81%11.85%-6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BERZ and SEF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2021

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between BERZ and SEF has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BERZ vs. SEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BERZ
SEF

Technology

62.3%

-

Communication Services

25.0%

-

Financial Services

13.3%
65.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

BERZ
62.3%
SEF

-

Communication Services

BERZ
25.0%
SEF

-

Financial Services

BERZ
13.3%
SEF
65.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BERZ
12.8%
SEF

-

Basic Materials

BERZ

-

SEF

-

Consumer Defensive

BERZ

-

SEF

-

Energy

BERZ

-

SEF

-

Healthcare

BERZ

-

SEF

-

Industrials

BERZ

-

SEF

-

Real Estate

BERZ

-

SEF

-

Utilities

BERZ

-

SEF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BERZ vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BERZ
BERZ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BERZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BERZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BERZ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BERZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BERZ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SEF
SEF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BERZ vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BERZSEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.69

1.06

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

0.39

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.54

0.73

-2.26

BERZ vs. SEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BERZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the SEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BERZ and SEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BERZSEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.14

0.26

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

-0.49

-0.26

Drawdowns

BERZ vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BERZ drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERZ and SEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BERZSEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-96.51%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.32%

-9.72%

-77.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.97%

-39.40%

-59.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.79%

-96.09%

-3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.57%

-82.72%

+11.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.07%

5.14%

+50.93%

Volatility

BERZ vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a higher volatility of 23.63% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 3.01%. This indicates that BERZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BERZSEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.63%

3.01%

+20.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.98%

10.85%

+47.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.77%

14.34%

+61.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.20%

17.96%

+74.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.20%

20.52%

+71.68%

BERZ vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BERZ and SEF have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

BERZ vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison

BERZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BERZ
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
3.35%4.33%5.72%4.43%0.39%0.00%0.12%1.25%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


BERZ and SEF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BERZ has higher volatility (23.63%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERZ dropped -99.80% vs SEF's -96.51%.

On 3-year performance, SEF leads with -10.34% vs -77.59% for BERZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEF has performed better with a -10.34% return vs -77.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BERZ and SEF have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for BERZ.

BERZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation Index, while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and ProShares.

SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BERZ and SEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer