PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BERZ vs. NRGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BERZ vs. NRGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BERZ vs. NRGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BERZ achieves a 19.74% return, which is significantly higher than NRGD's -69.03% return.


BERZ

1D
-14.87%
1M
7.73%
YTD
19.74%
6M
-4.91%
1Y
-79.02%
3Y*
-70.51%
5Y*
10Y*

NRGD

1D
5.43%
1M
-38.99%
YTD
-69.03%
6M
-68.32%
1Y
-79.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BERZ vs. NRGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BERZ and NRGD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

BERZ vs. NRGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BERZ
BERZ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BERZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BERZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BERZ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BERZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BERZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGD
NRGD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NRGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BERZ vs. NRGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BERZNRGDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.84

-0.89

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.52

-1.86

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.79

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

-0.89

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.00

-1.30

+0.31

BERZ vs. NRGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BERZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is comparable to the NRGD Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BERZ and NRGD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BERZNRGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

-0.89

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

-0.87

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between BERZ and NRGD is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BERZ vs. NRGD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BERZ nor NRGD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BERZ vs. NRGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BERZ drawdown since its inception was -99.46%, which is greater than NRGD's maximum drawdown of -89.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERZ and NRGD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BERZNRGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.46%

-89.38%

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.01%

-89.38%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.28%

-88.63%

-10.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.50%

-54.41%

-16.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.74%

61.18%

+17.56%

Volatility

BERZ vs. NRGD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a higher volatility of 29.36% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) at 19.52%. This indicates that BERZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BERZNRGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.36%

19.52%

+9.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.12%

50.19%

+10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.14%

88.75%

+5.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.55%

87.55%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.55%

87.55%

+5.00%