BEPC vs. ENFR
BEPC (Brookfield Renewable Corporation) is a stock, while ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Over the past year, BEPC returned 22.93% vs 27.76% for ENFR. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BEPC vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEPC achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.
BEPC
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- -0.57%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 20.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
BEPC vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation | 0.73% | 45.18% | -2.74% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.93% | 5.88% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEPC and ENFR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEPC vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
BEPC
ENFR
BEPC vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEPC | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.32 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 3.23 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 8.24 | -5.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEPC vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEPC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEPC and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEPC | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -68.28% | +48.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.92% | -8.64% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.92% | -4.71% | -8.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -15.94% | +9.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.79% | 3.38% | +5.41% |
Volatility
BEPC vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.69%. This indicates that BEPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEPC | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.04% | 5.69% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.71% | 11.60% | +15.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.91% | 14.86% | +19.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.22% | 19.25% | +15.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.22% | 24.68% | +10.54% |
Dividends
BEPC vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
BEPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, which matches ENFR's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation | 4.04% | 3.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEPC and ENFR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEPC has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to ENFR (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEPC dropped -19.92% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEPC and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer