BEPC vs. BIPC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC).

Performance

BEPC vs. BIPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BEPC vs. BIPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation	4.82%	45.18%	-1.88%
BIPC Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation	-12.15%	18.32%	4.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BEPC : $13.52B BIPC : $4.71B
EPS BEPC : -$10.07 BIPC : -$2.14
PS Ratio BEPC : 2.49 BIPC : 1.28
Total Revenue (TTM) BEPC : $3.73B BIPC : $3.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) BEPC : $2.23B BIPC : $2.34B
EBITDA (TTM) BEPC : $2.12B BIPC : $3.24B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEPC achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly higher than BIPC's -12.15% return.

BEPC

• 1D: 2.18%
• 1M: -6.79%
• YTD: 4.82%
• 6M: 17.82%
• 1Y: 48.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIPC

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: -20.77%
• YTD: -12.15%
• 6M: -2.09%
• 1Y: 13.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BEPC vs. BIPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEPC

BEPC Risk / Return Rank: 83
BEPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BEPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BEPC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BEPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BEPC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

BIPC

BIPC Risk / Return Rank: 56
BIPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BIPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
BIPC Omega Ratio Rank: 52
BIPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BIPC Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEPC vs. BIPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BEPC	BIPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	0.49	+0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	0.85	+1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.11	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	0.55	+2.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.15	2.18	+4.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BEPC vs. BIPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the BIPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEPC and BIPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEPC	BIPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	0.49	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.25	+0.83

Correlation

The correlation between BEPC and BIPC is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BEPC vs. BIPC - Dividend Comparison

BEPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than BIPC's 4.42% yield.

	TTM	2025
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation	3.79%	3.89%
BIPC Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation	4.42%	3.79%

Drawdowns

BEPC vs. BIPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEPC drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, smaller than the maximum BIPC drawdown of -25.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEPC and BIPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEPC	BIPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.62%	-25.28%	+8.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.44%	-25.28%	+9.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.39%	-21.80%	+12.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.63%	-6.10%	+0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.78%	6.41%	+0.37%

Volatility

BEPC vs. BIPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) is 9.50%, while Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) has a volatility of 11.19%. This indicates that BEPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEPC	BIPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.50%	11.19%	-1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.47%	20.13%	+2.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.65%	27.85%	+5.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.52%	28.80%	+4.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.52%	28.80%	+4.72%

Financials