PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEPC vs. BIPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BEPC vs. BIPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEPC achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than BIPC's -12.81% return.


BEPC

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.07%
YTD
0.73%
6M
-0.57%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIPC

1D
2.48%
1M
-6.94%
YTD
-12.81%
6M
-14.78%
1Y
-2.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEPC vs. BIPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BEPC
Brookfield Renewable Corporation
0.73%45.18%-2.57%
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
-12.81%18.32%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BEPC and BIPC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BEPC:

$6.91B

BIPC:

$5.16B

EPS

BEPC:

-$29.65

BIPC:

-$6.15

PS Ratio

BEPC:

1.70

BIPC:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

BEPC:

$4.03B

BIPC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BEPC:

$1.93B

BIPC:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

BEPC:

$563.03M

BIPC:

$2.59B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEPC vs. BIPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEPC
BEPC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BEPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEPC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BEPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEPC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BIPC
BIPC Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BIPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIPC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BIPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIPC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEPC vs. BIPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEPCBIPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.01

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

-0.08

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

-0.22

+2.84

BEPC vs. BIPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the BIPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEPC and BIPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BEPC vs. BIPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEPC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum BIPC drawdown of -29.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEPC and BIPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEPCBIPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-29.77%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.92%

-29.77%

+9.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.92%

-22.38%

+9.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-8.17%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.79%

11.28%

-2.49%

Volatility

BEPC vs. BIPC - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) at 7.16%. This indicates that BEPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEPCBIPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

7.16%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.71%

22.91%

+3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.91%

28.44%

+5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.22%

29.70%

+5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.22%

29.70%

+5.52%

Dividends

BEPC vs. BIPC - Dividend Comparison

BEPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than BIPC's 4.56% yield.


Financials

BEPC vs. BIPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Renewable Corporation and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.21B
871.76M
(BEPC) Total Revenue
(BIPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BEPC and BIPC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEPC has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to BIPC (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEPC dropped -19.92% vs BIPC's -29.77%.

BEPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEPC and BIPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer