BEP-PR.TO vs. BAM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP-PR.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM).

Performance

BEP-PR.TO vs. BAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP-PR.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BEP-PR.TO vs. BAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BEP-PR.TO Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.	5.15%	22.48%	26.67%	-3.24%	0.48%
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc.	-13.91%	-4.82%	51.70%	42.41%	-9.67%

Different Trading Currencies

BEP-PR.TO is traded in CAD, while BAM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BAM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEP-PR.TO achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly higher than BAM's -13.91% return.

BEP-PR.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 5.15%
• 6M: 8.81%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: 15.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAM

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -4.97%
• YTD: -13.91%
• 6M: -19.67%
• 1Y: -10.50%
• 3Y*: 15.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BEP-PR.TO vs. BAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEP-PR.TO

BEP-PR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
BEP-PR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BEP-PR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BEP-PR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
BEP-PR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
BEP-PR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

BAM

BAM Risk / Return Rank: 30
BAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BAM Omega Ratio Rank: 26
BAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
BAM Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEP-PR.TO vs. BAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP-PR.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BEP-PR.TO	BAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	-0.33	+2.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	-0.25	+2.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	0.97	+0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	-0.30	+2.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.53	-0.68	+10.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BEP-PR.TO vs. BAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEP-PR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the BAM Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEP-PR.TO and BAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEP-PR.TO	BAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	-0.33	+2.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.53	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between BEP-PR.TO and BAM is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BEP-PR.TO vs. BAM - Dividend Comparison

BEP-PR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than BAM's 4.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BEP-PR.TO Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.	5.79%	6.00%	6.88%	8.00%	3.96%
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc.	4.12%	3.34%	2.80%	3.19%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BEP-PR.TO vs. BAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEP-PR.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.77%, roughly equal to the maximum BAM drawdown of -30.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEP-PR.TO and BAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEP-PR.TO	BAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.77%	-30.37%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.89%	-30.37%	+20.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-28.40%	+26.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.06%	-8.04%	-1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	13.71%	-11.44%

Volatility

BEP-PR.TO vs. BAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP-PR.TO) is 2.37%, while Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that BEP-PR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEP-PR.TO	BAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.37%	7.56%	-5.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.99%	22.22%	-16.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.79%	31.73%	-19.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.35%	28.83%	-14.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.35%	28.83%	-14.48%

Financials