BEP-PR.TO vs. FSV.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP-PR.TO) and Fidelity Special Values (FSV.L).
Performance
BEP-PR.TO vs. FSV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BEP-PR.TO vs. FSV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEP-PR.TO Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 5.15% | 22.48% | 26.67% | -3.24% | -17.57% |
FSV.L Fidelity Special Values | -1.31% | 40.79% | 23.57% | 6.50% | -3.73% |
Different Trading Currencies
BEP-PR.TO is traded in CAD, while FSV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FSV.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEP-PR.TO achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly higher than FSV.L's -1.31% return.
BEP-PR.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 5.15%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSV.L
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 30.48%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEP-PR.TO vs. FSV.L — Risk / Return Rank
BEP-PR.TO
FSV.L
BEP-PR.TO vs. FSV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP-PR.TO) and Fidelity Special Values (FSV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BEP-PR.TO | FSV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 1.67 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.21 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.16 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 8.54 | +0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEP-PR.TO | FSV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 1.67 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.57 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between BEP-PR.TO and FSV.L is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BEP-PR.TO vs. FSV.L - Dividend Comparison
BEP-PR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than FSV.L's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEP-PR.TO Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 5.79% | 6.00% | 6.88% | 8.00% | 3.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSV.L Fidelity Special Values | 2.48% | 2.44% | 3.05% | 3.15% | 2.78% | 2.21% | 2.38% | 2.61% | 2.19% | 1.80% | 1.62% | 1.67% |
Drawdowns
BEP-PR.TO vs. FSV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEP-PR.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.77%, smaller than the maximum FSV.L drawdown of -53.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEP-PR.TO and FSV.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEP-PR.TO | FSV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.77% | -51.87% | +22.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.89% | -14.02% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -10.43% | +8.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -8.51% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 3.30% | -1.03% |
Volatility
BEP-PR.TO vs. FSV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP-PR.TO) is 2.37%, while Fidelity Special Values (FSV.L) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that BEP-PR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BEP-PR.TO | FSV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 7.27% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.99% | 12.12% | -6.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 18.21% | -6.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 18.75% | -4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 23.48% | -9.13% |
Financials
BEP-PR.TO vs. FSV.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and Fidelity Special Values. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities