BENJ vs. CANC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BENJ (Horizon Landmark ETF) and CANC (Tema Oncology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BENJ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Horizon, while CANC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BENJ returned 3.81% vs 47.37% for CANC. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. BENJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CANC.

Performance

BENJ vs. CANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BENJ achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than CANC's 4.82% return.

BENJ

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CANC

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -3.73%
• YTD: 4.82%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 47.37%
• 3Y*: 107.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BENJ vs. CANC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	1.47%	3.75%
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	4.82%	35.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BENJ and CANC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

BENJ vs. CANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BENJ

BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 98
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CANC

CANC Risk / Return Rank: 69
CANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CANC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CANC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BENJ vs. CANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BENJ	CANC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.70	2.06	+3.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	9.22	2.96	+6.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	5.02	1.34	+3.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.79	5.49	+4.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	46.19	14.62	+31.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BENJ vs. CANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BENJ Sharpe Ratio is 5.70, which is higher than the CANC Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BENJ and CANC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BENJ	CANC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.70	2.06	+3.64
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.43	-0.04	+6.47

Drawdowns

BENJ vs. CANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BENJ drawdown since its inception was -0.39%, smaller than the maximum CANC drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BENJ and CANC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BENJ	CANC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-97.53%	+97.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.39%	-8.67%	+8.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-56.55%	+56.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-73.19%	+73.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	3.25%	-3.17%

Volatility

BENJ vs. CANC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) is 0.06%, while Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that BENJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BENJ	CANC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.06%	6.26%	-6.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.23%	16.69%	-16.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67%	23.11%	-22.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.60%	280.27%	-279.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.60%	280.27%	-279.67%

BENJ vs. CANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BENJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CANC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BENJ vs. CANC - Dividend Comparison

BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	0.05%	0.06%	3.00%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BENJ and CANC in my portfolio?

BENJ and CANC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BENJ or CANC?

CANC has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to BENJ (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BENJ dropped -0.39% vs CANC's -97.53%.

Which ETF is better, BENJ or CANC?

On 1-year performance, CANC leads with 47.37% vs 3.81% for BENJ. On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BENJ or CANC?

Over the 1-year period, CANC has performed better with a 47.37% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BENJ or CANC?

BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CANC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BENJ or CANC?

CANC has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

What is the main difference between BENJ and CANC?

BENJ is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CANC is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BENJ and 0.75% for CANC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.70 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.