BEMIX vs. BINCX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BEMIX (Brandes Emerging Markets Fund) and BINCX (Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C) are both mutual funds - BEMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Brandes, while BINCX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Brandes. Over the past 10 years, BEMIX returned 9.93%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for BINCX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BEMIX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for BINCX.

Performance

BEMIX vs. BINCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEMIX achieves a 24.08% return, which is significantly higher than BINCX's -1.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BEMIX having a 9.93% annualized return and BINCX not far behind at 9.84%.

BEMIX

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 24.08%
• 6M: 26.01%
• 1Y: 56.98%
• 3Y*: 25.68%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

BINCX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: -1.57%
• 6M: -0.90%
• 1Y: 10.26%
• 3Y*: 25.99%
• 5Y*: 16.15%
• 10Y*: 9.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEMIX vs. BINCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund	24.08%	47.83%	4.01%	22.53%	-15.91%	1.68%	-6.17%	18.60%	-15.56%	26.00%
BINCX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C	-1.57%	44.63%	22.20%	37.99%	-9.36%	18.22%	3.79%	6.06%	-20.76%	10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BEMIX and BINCX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.74

The correlation between BEMIX and BINCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BEMIX vs. BINCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEMIX

BEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
BEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
BEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

BINCX

BINCX Risk / Return Rank: 10
BINCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BINCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BINCX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BINCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BINCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEMIX vs. BINCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEMIX	BINCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.12	0.78	+2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.89	1.22	+2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.14	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.63	0.84	+3.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.44	2.23	+16.21

BEMIX vs. BINCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the BINCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEMIX and BINCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BEMIX vs. BINCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEMIX drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, roughly equal to the maximum BINCX drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMIX and BINCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEMIX	BINCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.05%	-48.15%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.07%	-11.66%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.08%	-11.66%	-4.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.97%	-31.97%	-4.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.05%	-48.15%	+2.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-9.62%	+8.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.14%	-9.40%	-4.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	4.38%	-1.36%

Volatility

BEMIX vs. BINCX - Volatility Comparison

Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) at 3.54%. This indicates that BEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEMIX	BINCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	3.54%	+4.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.75%	10.40%	+5.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.92%	12.53%	+5.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.81%	13.91%	+2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.18%	14.26%	+2.92%

BEMIX vs. BINCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEMIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BINCX's 1.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEMIX vs. BINCX - Dividend Comparison

BEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than BINCX's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund	1.73%	2.15%	3.04%	2.45%	2.86%	2.31%	1.31%	2.56%	1.55%	1.41%	2.20%	1.54%
BINCX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C	3.06%	3.01%	2.54%	2.45%	2.98%	3.85%	0.60%	0.21%	3.77%	7.83%	3.75%	3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEMIX and BINCX in my portfolio?

BEMIX and BINCX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEMIX or BINCX?

BEMIX has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to BINCX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEMIX dropped -46.05% vs BINCX's -48.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.