PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BELFA vs. CCJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BELFA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BELFA achieves a 66.55% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 19.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BELFA has outperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 32.77%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively lower 27.23% annualized return.


BELFA

1D
-6.60%
1M
0.13%
YTD
66.55%
6M
60.49%
1Y
198.10%
3Y*
66.39%
5Y*
80.09%
10Y*
32.77%

CCJ

1D
1.70%
1M
3.95%
YTD
19.02%
6M
16.57%
1Y
56.49%
3Y*
54.15%
5Y*
40.65%
10Y*
27.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BELFA vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BELFA
Bel Fuse Inc.
66.55%68.98%39.80%102.03%117.06%14.81%-16.19%19.66%-36.22%-12.91%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
19.02%78.38%19.47%90.49%4.35%63.19%51.47%-21.08%23.58%-8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BELFA and CCJ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 1996

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BELFA:

$534.40M

CCJ:

$47.44B

EPS

BELFA:

$7.60

CCJ:

CA$1.49

PE Ratio

BELFA:

33.23

CCJ:

103.22

PEG Ratio

BELFA:

0.80

CCJ:

0.86

PS Ratio

BELFA:

2.61

CCJ:

18.98

PB Ratio

BELFA:

0.56

CCJ:

9.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

BELFA:

$701.71M

CCJ:

CA$3.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BELFA:

$275.20M

CCJ:

CA$1.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

BELFA:

$135.78M

CCJ:

CA$996.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BELFA vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BELFA
BELFA Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BELFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BELFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BELFA Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BELFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BELFA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BELFA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BELFACCJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.21

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.14

1.95

+7.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.78

4.57

+23.21

BELFA vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BELFA Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BELFA and CCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BELFA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BELFA drawdown since its inception was -89.86%, roughly equal to the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BELFA and CCJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BELFACCJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.86%

-87.53%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.82%

-29.13%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.43%

-40.01%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.43%

-40.01%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.04%

-57.22%

-20.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.68%

-18.79%

+12.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.43%

-46.05%

-4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

12.38%

-5.21%

Volatility

BELFA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFA) is 16.41%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 18.32%. This indicates that BELFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BELFACCJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.41%

18.32%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.40%

39.71%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.50%

55.36%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.06%

49.79%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.94%

46.78%

+14.16%

Dividends

BELFA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

BELFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than CCJ's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BELFA
Bel Fuse Inc.
0.09%0.16%0.27%0.39%0.78%1.60%1.81%1.48%1.75%1.10%0.95%1.64%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.16%0.19%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%4.33%3.82%3.24%

Financials

BELFA vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bel Fuse Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
178.49M
847.55M
(BELFA) Total Revenue
(CCJ) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BELFA values in USD, CCJ values in CAD

BELFA vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bel Fuse Inc. and Cameco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
39.0%
34.3%
Portfolio components
BELFA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported a gross profit of 69.60M and revenue of 178.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

CCJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

BELFA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported an operating income of 23.67M and revenue of 178.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.

CCJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

BELFA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported a net income of 11.38M and revenue of 178.49M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

CCJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BELFA and CCJ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCJ has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to BELFA (16.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BELFA dropped -89.86% vs CCJ's -87.53%.

BELFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BELFA and CCJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer