BELFA vs. CCJ
BELFA (Bel Fuse Inc.) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. BELFA operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, BELFA returned 30.73%/yr vs 24.79%/yr for CCJ. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BELFA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BELFA achieves a 45.68% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's -1.41% return. Over the past 10 years, BELFA has outperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 30.73%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively lower 24.79% annualized return.
BELFA
- 1D
- -3.72%
- 1M
- -15.43%
- 6M
- 30.80%
- YTD
- 45.68%
- 1Y
- 140.66%
- 3Y*
- 54.12%
- 5Y*
- 73.30%
- 10Y*
- 30.73%
CCJ
- 1D
- -6.03%
- 1M
- -10.66%
- 6M
- -17.84%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 24.31%
- 3Y*
- 42.22%
- 5Y*
- 39.14%
- 10Y*
- 24.79%
BELFA vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BELFA Bel Fuse Inc. | 45.68% | 68.98% | 39.80% | 102.03% | 117.06% | 14.81% | -16.19% | 19.66% | -36.22% | -12.91% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | -1.41% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BELFA and CCJ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 1996 | 0.12 |
The correlation between BELFA and CCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BELFA:
$3.17B
CCJ:
$39.29B
BELFA:
$9.95
CCJ:
CA$1.49
BELFA:
22.21
CCJ:
85.54
BELFA:
0.54
CCJ:
0.71
BELFA:
1.74
CCJ:
15.73
BELFA:
0.49
CCJ:
7.86
BELFA:
$701.71M
CCJ:
CA$3.54B
BELFA:
$275.20M
CCJ:
CA$1.04B
BELFA:
$135.78M
CCJ:
CA$996.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BELFA vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
BELFA
CCJ
BELFA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BELFA | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.12 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.61 | 0.75 | +4.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.49 | 1.77 | +15.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BELFA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BELFA drawdown since its inception was -89.86%, roughly equal to the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BELFA and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BELFA | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.86% | -87.53% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.21% | -32.73% | +7.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.43% | -40.01% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.43% | -40.01% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.04% | -57.22% | -20.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.11% | -32.73% | +8.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.39% | -46.02% | -4.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.07% | 13.77% | -5.70% |
Volatility
BELFA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFA) has a higher volatility of 26.92% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 12.52%. This indicates that BELFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BELFA | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.92% | 12.52% | +14.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.75% | 39.77% | +5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.44% | 55.47% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.91% | 49.88% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.22% | 46.84% | +14.38% |
Dividends
BELFA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
BELFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than CCJ's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BELFA Bel Fuse Inc. | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.48% | 1.75% | 1.10% | 0.95% | 1.64% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
Financials
BELFA vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bel Fuse Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BELFA vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison
BELFA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported a gross profit of 69.60M and revenue of 178.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.
CCJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
BELFA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported an operating income of 23.67M and revenue of 178.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.
CCJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
BELFA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported a net income of 11.38M and revenue of 178.49M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
CCJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BELFA and CCJ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BELFA has higher volatility (26.92%) compared to CCJ (12.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BELFA dropped -89.86% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
BELFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BELFA and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer