BEGS vs. YCS
BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - BEGS is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Rareview, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). BEGS is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, BEGS returned -27.06% vs 31.27% for YCS. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. BEGS charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
BEGS vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEGS achieves a -40.92% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.63% return.
BEGS
- 1D
- -6.30%
- 1M
- -28.30%
- YTD
- -40.92%
- 6M
- -43.07%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 23.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
BEGS vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF | -40.92% | 32.00% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.63% | 16.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEGS and YCS is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEGS vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
BEGS
YCS
BEGS vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEGS | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.34 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 3.78 | -4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 11.93 | -12.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEGS vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEGS drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGS and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEGS | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -49.56% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.22% | -8.30% | -47.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.22% | -0.14% | -56.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | -19.87% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.38% | 2.65% | +23.73% |
Volatility
BEGS vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) has a higher volatility of 21.49% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that BEGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEGS | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.49% | 2.25% | +19.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.69% | 12.19% | +44.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.35% | 16.93% | +49.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.70% | 21.10% | +42.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.70% | 18.82% | +44.88% |
BEGS vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEGS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEGS vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
BEGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.64%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF | 81.64% | 48.23% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEGS and YCS have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEGS has higher volatility (21.49%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGS dropped -56.22% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 31.27% vs -27.06% for BEGS. On fees, BEGS is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 31.27% return vs -27.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BEGS is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 81.64%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
BEGS is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Rareview and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEGS and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEGS and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer