BEGS vs. WNTR
BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BEGS is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Rareview, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BEGS returned -37.63% vs 107.38% for WNTR. Their -0.71 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BEGS charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
BEGS vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEGS achieves a -41.25% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.75% return.
BEGS
- 1D
- -4.44%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- 6M
- -44.88%
- YTD
- -41.25%
- 1Y
- -37.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -15.83%
WNTR
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 107.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.85K | $70.66K | $58.45K | |
| $4.02M | $3.86M | $3.95M |
BEGS vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF | -41.25% | 56.72% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.75% | 52.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEGS and WNTR is -0.71, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.71 |
The correlation between BEGS and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.71 to -0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEGS vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
BEGS
WNTR
BEGS vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEGS | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.32 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 2.71 | -3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 6.87 | -8.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEGS vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEGS drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGS and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEGS | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.23% | -42.65% | -17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.23% | -42.65% | -17.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.47% | -9.64% | -46.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.76% | -20.18% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.21% | 16.81% | +15.40% |
Volatility
BEGS vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) has a higher volatility of 16.14% compared to YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 14.85%. This indicates that BEGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEGS | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.14% | 14.85% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.59% | 47.43% | +9.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.71% | 54.68% | +13.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.24% | 53.42% | +9.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.24% | 53.42% | +9.82% |
BEGS vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEGS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEGS vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
BEGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.09%, less than WNTR's 107.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF | 82.09% | 48.23% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.02% | 58.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEGS and WNTR have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEGS has higher volatility (16.14%) compared to WNTR (14.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGS dropped -60.23% vs WNTR's -42.65%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs -37.63% for BEGS. On fees, BEGS is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 14.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs -37.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BEGS is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 82.09% for BEGS.
BEGS is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Rareview and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEGS and 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEGS and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer