BEGS vs. CSHP
BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BEGS is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Rareview, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BEGS returned -39.83% vs 3.66% for CSHP. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEGS charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
BEGS vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEGS achieves a -41.28% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.84% return.
BEGS
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- -13.01%
- 6M
- -51.45%
- YTD
- -41.28%
- 1Y
- -39.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEGS vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF | -41.28% | 32.00% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.84% | 3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEGS and CSHP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEGS vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
BEGS
CSHP
BEGS vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEGS | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 3.37 | -2.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 11.37 | -12.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 118.25 | -119.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEGS vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEGS drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGS and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEGS | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.23% | -0.32% | -59.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.23% | -0.32% | -59.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.49% | -0.32% | -56.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.70% | -0.01% | -19.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.09% | 0.03% | +30.06% |
Volatility
BEGS vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) has a higher volatility of 18.71% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.58%. This indicates that BEGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEGS | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.71% | 0.58% | +18.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.07% | 0.62% | +56.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.44% | 0.66% | +66.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.70% | 0.57% | +63.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.70% | 0.57% | +63.13% |
BEGS vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEGS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEGS vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
BEGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.13%, more than CSHP's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF | 82.13% | 48.23% | 0.00% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 4.02% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEGS and CSHP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEGS has higher volatility (18.71%) compared to CSHP (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGS dropped -60.23% vs CSHP's -0.32%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.66% vs -39.83% for BEGS. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.66% return vs -39.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEGS.
BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 82.13%, compared with 4.02% for CSHP.
BEGS is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Rareview and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEGS and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEGS and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer