BEGS vs. BCDF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BEGS is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Rareview, while BCDF is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BEGS returned -39.83% vs 3.84% for BCDF. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEGS charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.

Performance

BEGS vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEGS achieves a -41.28% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 4.63% return.

BEGS

• 1D: -3.64%
• 1M: -13.01%
• 6M: -51.45%
• YTD: -41.28%
• 1Y: -39.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCDF

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: -1.03%
• YTD: 4.63%
• 1Y: 3.84%
• 3Y*: 14.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEGS vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	-41.28%	32.00%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	4.63%	10.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BEGS and BCDF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

BEGS vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEGS

BEGS Risk / Return Rank: 4
BEGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BEGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BEGS Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 13
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEGS vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEGS	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	0.25	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.55	0.45	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.05	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	0.27	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	0.84	-2.16

BEGS vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEGS and BCDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BEGS vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEGS drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGS and BCDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEGS	BCDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.23%	-27.70%	-32.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.23%	-14.02%	-46.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.49%	-6.38%	-50.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.70%	-9.80%	-9.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.09%	4.60%	+25.49%

Volatility

BEGS vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) has a higher volatility of 18.71% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 5.15%. This indicates that BEGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEGS	BCDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.71%	5.15%	+13.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.07%	11.34%	+45.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.44%	15.44%	+52.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.70%	16.93%	+46.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.70%	16.93%	+46.77%

BEGS vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEGS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEGS vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

BEGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.13%, more than BCDF's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.41%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	82.13%	48.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEGS and BCDF in my portfolio?

BEGS and BCDF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEGS or BCDF?

BEGS has higher volatility (18.71%) compared to BCDF (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGS dropped -60.23% vs BCDF's -27.70%.

Which ETF is better, BEGS or BCDF?

On 1-year performance, BCDF leads with 3.84% vs -39.83% for BEGS. On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BCDF has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BEGS or BCDF?

Over the 1-year period, BCDF has performed better with a 3.84% return vs -39.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEGS or BCDF?

BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEGS or BCDF?

BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 82.13%, compared with 2.41% for BCDF.

What is the main difference between BEGS and BCDF?

BEGS is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while BCDF is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Rareview and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEGS and 0.85% for BCDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.